Author summary
60% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ej Dickson results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Pessimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,053 hits . Analysis detected 7,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,972 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 48% (4,794 of 9,145 authors). This Ej Dickson is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. Ej Dickson
Author details
Total words: 9,972
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst