Author summary
77% 1 analyzed article/video 1,343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Janet Jackson results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 781 hits . Analysis detected 4,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,560 of 9,118 authors). This Dr. Janet Jackson is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Dr. Janet Jackson
Author details
Total words: 5,372
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 14.5% 14.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 14.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst