Author summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 1,321 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DIDI TANG Associated Press results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 496 hits . Analysis detected 3,930 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,291 of 9,143 authors). This DIDI TANG Associated Press is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. DIDI TANG Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 5,284
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst