Author summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diana Raab Ph.D. results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 212 hits . Analysis detected 1,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,758 of 9,086 authors). This Diana Raab Ph.D. is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Diana Raab Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 3,412
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Middle Ground: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst