Author summary
46% 1 analyzed article/video 1,236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diana Berg results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Negativity Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 335 hits . Analysis detected 2,670 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (6,957 of 9,102 authors). This Diana Berg is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Diana Berg
Author details
Total words: 4,944
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst