Author summary
ā 76% 1 analyzed article/video 608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Goodman results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 369 hits . Analysis detected 1,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ā 71% (2,611 of 9,007 authors). This David Goodman is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group. David Goodman
Author details
Total words: 2,432
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.0% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.2% 15.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Straw Man: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst