Author summary
â 12% 1 analyzed article/video 1,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Gilbert results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 201 hits . Analysis detected 1,602 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of â 35% (5,896 of 8,965 authors). This David Gilbert is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group. David Gilbert
Author details
Total words: 4,088
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst