Author summary
65% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,543 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dánica Coto results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 711 hits . Analysis detected 4,475 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,172 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 68% (3,002 of 9,170 authors). This Dánica Coto is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group. Dánica Coto
Author details
Total words: 6,172
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.3% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 11.5% 11.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst