Author summary
96% 8 analyzed articles/videos 552 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Diamond results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 804 hits . Analysis detected 3,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,468 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 94% (573 of 9,077 authors). This Dan Diamond is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group. Dan Diamond
Author details
Total words: 2,468
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.7% percentile 7.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 32.6% 32.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 9.6% 9.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 24.9% 24.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.2% 6.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 32.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 29.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 24.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 9.6%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst