Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bianca Zalben results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 631 hits . Analysis detected 2,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 94% (544 of 9,118 authors). This Bianca Zalben is worse (more manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group. Bianca Zalben
Author details
Total words: 1,560
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.0% percentile 8.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 40.5% 40.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.5% 17.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.3% 8.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 20.4% 20.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 40.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Burden of Proof: Author 9.9%, sitewide 0.4% Anecdotal: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst