Author summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Araceli Gómez-Aldana results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 1.8% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 167 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (7,909 of 9,095 authors). This Araceli Gómez-Aldana is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Araceli Gómez-Aldana
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠13%Araceli Gómez-Aldana (selected)2%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,940
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 0.5%0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos