Author summary
42% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,345 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Caswell results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 424 hits . Analysis detected 3,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,681 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 48% (4,756 of 9,103 authors). This Amanda Caswell is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Amanda Caswell
Author details
Total words: 4,681
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst