Author summary
42% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alice Gibbs results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 543 hits . Analysis detected 3,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,852 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (5,964 of 9,166 authors). This Alice Gibbs is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group. Alice Gibbs
Author details
Total words: 6,852
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst