Author summary
12%2 analyzed articles/videos632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alazia Williams results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 927 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,528 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 44% (5,096 of 9,099 authors). This Alazia Williams is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Alazia Williams
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
44%Alazia Williams (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,528
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510044.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 10.3%10.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate