Author summary
66% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,953 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Glasserman results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,836 hits . Analysis detected 12,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,660 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,297 of 9,089 authors). This Aaron Glasserman is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group. Aaron Glasserman
Author details
Total words: 15,660
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.7% 11.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.0% 5.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst