CBS News99%

Pete Hegseth said any peace deal with Iran "will be a good deal" #shorts 99%

5/30/2026, 8:27:11 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 48.8% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 826 faulty-reasoning hits from 209 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 99% and a BS Rank of 99% (293 of 29,926 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.00% of the video peer group.

Any deal will be a good deal. 
And I had a chance to talk to President Trump this morning. 
He He wanted me to reiterate how patient he is in ensuring that with America undertaking this kind of historic endeavor, any deal will be a good one, a great one, and he's patient in the pursuit of that because of how the implications of how that sorts out. 
And certainly our department, he we were in a cabinet meeting just a couple of days ago and the president said he will be a great deal. 
And if Iran doesn't want to make a great deal that ensures they don't get a nuclear weapon, they can deal with the guy on my left. 
That was the only time I've ever been accused of being on the left. 
And he was pointing at the war department. 
And we're serious about that. 
We our ability to recommence if necessary is we are more than capable. 
Our stockpiles are are more than suited for that both there and around the globe because of how we balance exquisite and and more plentiful munitions. 
So we're in a very good place. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 42.1%CBS News: 8.9%Confirmation Bias42.1%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 3.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%CBS News: 11.4%Availability Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 2.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.3%CBS News: 2.1%Hindsight Bias3.3%This article: 38.3%CBS News: 6.1%Overconfidence Bias38.3%This article: 30.1%CBS News: 15.8%Framing Effect30.1%This article: 12.9%CBS News: 1.2%Loss Aversion12.9%This article: 12.4%CBS News: 1.7%Status Quo Bias12.4%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.7%CBS News: 6.5%Optimism Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 2.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 13.7%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%CBS News: 3.3%Self-Serving Bias10.5%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 2.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 2.4%CBS News: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 3.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.9%CBS News: 4.8%Halo Effect12.9%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 3.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%CBS News: 1.5%Primacy Effect5.7%This article: 6.7%CBS News: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 48.8%CBS News: 10.3%Appeal to Authority48.8%This article: 12.9%CBS News: 3.3%False Dilemma12.9%This article: 12.9%CBS News: 2.0%Slippery Slope12.9%This article: 12.4%CBS News: 0.5%Circular Reasoning12.4%This article: 30.1%CBS News: 10.8%Hasty Generalization30.1%This article: 6.2%CBS News: 0.6%Red Herring6.2%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 1.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.2%CBS News: 13.0%Appeal to Emotion6.2%This article: 3.3%CBS News: 2.5%Begging the Question3.3%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 4.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 2.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.5%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.3%CBS News: 0.9%Composition/Division3.3%This article: 19.6%CBS News: 6.3%Anecdotal19.6%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.4%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 3.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.7%CBS News: 1.9%Biased Writer Voice6.7%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 45.0%CBS News: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias45.0%This article: 0.0%CBS News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

209 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker93%attributed speech14writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 7 words • 100.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 12 words • 100.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 49 words • 0.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 27 words • 100.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 27 words • 100.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 14 words • 0.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 8 words • 0.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 5 words • 0.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 26 words • 0.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 7 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Pete Hegseth

100%flagged-word coverage
195 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Pete Hegseth: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -59.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Pete Hegseth: 41.0%41.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.