Frozen burritos sold at Costco prompt public health alert over undeclared allergen ⁠10%

7/31/2026, 5:06:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Status Quo Bias, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 237 faulty-reasoning hits from 257 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (27,598 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the article peer group.

The U.S. 
Department of Agriculture has issued a public health alert for a frozen burrito sold at Costco because officials claim it contains an undeclared allergen. 
A product labeled as Red’s Steak Cilantro and Lime Burrito, which was produced on June 19, contains egg not declared on its label. 
The burritos were shipped to Costco stores in Illinois, Michigan and Minnesota . 
A recall for the product wasn’t issued because the burritos are no longer for sale, but the USDA said they could be inside customers’ freezers. 
The problem was discovered after a consumer flagged the issue to the company after they realized there was egg inside the burrito, and the company notified the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service. 
No adverse reactions have been reported after eating the burrito. 
The burritos were both packaged individually and sold 10 in a 3 lb, 2 oz. carton. 
The product lots for the affected burritos include: L1 SD6170 1503, L1 SD6170 1535, L1 SD6170 1606, L1 SD6170 1639, L1 SD6170 1717, L1 SD6170 1750, L1 SD6170 1831, L1 SD6170 1908, L1 SD6170 1954, L1 SD6170 2031, L1 SD6170 2108, and L1 SD6170 2130 on the side of the label. 
They also have "EST. 46069" inside the USDA mark of inspection. 
Anyone who finds one of the burritos in their freezer is urged to throw them out or return them to where they were bought. 
Red’s and Costco did not immediately respond to FOX Business' requests for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 4.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 3.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%FoxBusiness: 3.9%Availability Heuristic5.1%This article: 8.9%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic8.9%This article: 12.8%FoxBusiness: 0.6%Hindsight Bias12.8%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 3.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 12.1%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 9.3%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Loss Aversion9.3%This article: 9.7%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%FoxBusiness: 8.4%Optimism Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%FoxBusiness: 7.5%Negativity Bias14.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 4.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 3.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.3%FoxBusiness: 6.7%Appeal to Authority9.3%This article: 9.7%FoxBusiness: 1.5%False Dilemma9.7%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 5.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 3.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 9.3%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination9.3%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

257 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers14%attributed speech220writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words65% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Indoctrination-10.9 ptsWriter: 10.9%Department of Agriculture: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.