The Blaze86%

Sheriff pushes back against edict from New York governor to END cooperation with ICE 54%

By Carlos Garcia77%

7/31/2026, 4:30:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 765 faulty-reasoning hits from 359 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.4% and a BS Rank of 54% (13,174 of 28,442 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the article peer group.

At least one sheriff in New York state is pushing back against a new law forcing law enforcement agencies to stop cooperating with U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 
Democratic New York Governor Kathy Hochul and Attorney General Letitia James issued an order on July 24 requiring 12 local law enforcement agencies to terminate their agreements with ICE. 
'All I can say about immigration-related issues is that if there is a very dangerous person in this jail, and the expectation is that I'm going to release that person back out into the community, I'm not doing that. 
' 
Broome County Sheriff Fred Akshar excoriated the order in a media briefing where he called politicians in the state capital hypocrites. 
“It is becoming increasingly ... frustrating, you know, to listen to the edicts and, you know, the white noise coming from, again, the political class in Albany,” Akshar said. 
“I would like to think that the vast majority of New Yorkers understand that the political class in Albany continues to destroy the great state of New York.” 
Akshar said he would have to comply with the law ending 287(g) programs in the state by Aug. 25 but indicated that he would continue to cooperate with ICE in other ways. 
"And you have policy after policy after policy as it pertains to public safety that continues to put criminals over law-abiding New Yorkers," he added. 
"And that is frustrating. 
So the reality is this: Whether or not I agree or disagree with a law that has been authored by the legislature and signed by the governor, my responsibility is to enforce the law." 
RELATED: Dem. 
Gov. 
Hochul says NY college campuses will be offered as emergency shelters for NYC illegal immigrants 
"All I can say about immigration-related issues is that if there is a very dangerous person in this jail, and the expectation is that I'm going to release that person back out into the community, I'm not doing that," he added. 
Broome County is located in the Southern Tier of the state and includes about 195,000 residents. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 4.0%Blaze Media: 5.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.6%Blaze Media: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 22.3%Carlos Garcia: 3.1%Blaze Media: 2.9%Availability Heuristic22.3%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.6%Blaze Media: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.8%Blaze Media: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 25.6%Carlos Garcia: 10.4%Blaze Media: 8.7%Framing Effect25.6%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.1%Blaze Media: 1.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.9%Blaze Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.8%Carlos Garcia: 11.7%Blaze Media: 9.2%Negativity Bias19.8%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.6%Blaze Media: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.4%Blaze Media: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Carlos Garcia: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.4%In-Group Bias7.8%This article: 13.9%Carlos Garcia: 0.9%Blaze Media: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias13.9%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.3%Blaze Media: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 13.9%Carlos Garcia: 2.9%Blaze Media: 2.3%Ad Hominem13.9%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.7%Blaze Media: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.9%Blaze Media: 3.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.5%Blaze Media: 2.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.8%Carlos Garcia: 4.5%Blaze Media: 7.6%Hasty Generalization14.8%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.4%Blaze Media: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 7.8%Carlos Garcia: 0.8%Blaze Media: 0.7%Bandwagon7.8%This article: 38.4%Carlos Garcia: 10.2%Blaze Media: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion38.4%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.9%Blaze Media: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.1%Blaze Media: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.0%Blaze Media: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.8%Blaze Media: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.9%Carlos Garcia: 3.5%Blaze Media: 2.5%Unattributed Quote10.9%This article: 10.9%Carlos Garcia: 3.3%Blaze Media: 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection10.9%This article: 16.4%Carlos Garcia: 5.7%Blaze Media: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice16.4%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.9%Blaze Media: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.7%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Carlos Garcia: 4.9%Blaze Media: 6.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.7%Blaze Media: 2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

359 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker56%attributed speech158writer words
Selected voice

Fred Akshar

83%flagged-word coverage
201 attributed words100% of attributed speech37% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-37.3 ptsWriter: 37.3%Fred Akshar: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -24.1 ptsWriter: 24.1%Fred Akshar: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+19.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Fred Akshar: 19.4%19.4%Quote-first Misdirection+19.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Fred Akshar: 19.4%19.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.