Townhall⁠93%

WNBA Player Cries White Privilege After Getting Ejected for Hard Foul Against Sophie Cunningham ⁠91%

By Joe Chalfant⁠99%

8/8/2026, 11:30:17 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 54.5% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 962 faulty-reasoning hits from 224 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 79% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,817 of 30,584 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.80% of the article peer group.

Indiana Fever star Sophie Cunningham was subjected to a horrific flagrant foul on Saturday’s game versus the Chicago Sky. 
DiJonai Carrington, a forward for the Sky, clotheslined Cunningham as she attempted a fast break layup late in the first quarter. 
Carrington was awarded a Flagrant 2 for the intentional act and found herself ejected from the game as a result. 
Shortly following her ejection, Carrington, a black woman, accused officials of racism for being held accountable for her actions. 
Carrington would later post a thinly veiled threat against Cunningham by posting the date of the Sky’s next game against the Fever on August 23. 
Cunningham has found herself as a target of players, officials, coaches, and fans for taking a stand against men entering the WNBA due to the league’s refusal to restrict transgender players from participating in women’s basketball. 
The league has announced that it will begin investigations into “what a woman is” to settle the matter as the controversy dominates discussions surrounding the WNBA. 
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 27.2%Joe Chalfant: 7.6%Townhall: 5.5%Confirmation Bias27.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Joe Chalfant: 3.1%Townhall: 2.6%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 1.9%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 26.3%Joe Chalfant: 14.7%Townhall: 10.0%Framing Effect26.3%This article: 5.8%Joe Chalfant: 0.7%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion5.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.8%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%Joe Chalfant: 2.4%Townhall: 1.2%Optimism Bias6.3%This article: 11.6%Joe Chalfant: 1.3%Townhall: 1.8%Pessimism Bias11.6%This article: 54.5%Joe Chalfant: 15.8%Townhall: 13.2%Negativity Bias54.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 3.3%Townhall: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Joe Chalfant: 5.2%Townhall: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error8.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 4.6%Townhall: 4.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 16.1%Joe Chalfant: 1.9%Townhall: 3.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias16.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 1.9%Townhall: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 1.0%Townhall: 1.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 3.4%Townhall: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Joe Chalfant: 3.2%Townhall: 0.5%Primacy Effect7.6%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 2.0%Townhall: 5.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 7.6%Joe Chalfant: 4.9%Townhall: 1.9%Straw Man7.6%This article: 13.4%Joe Chalfant: 5.7%Townhall: 3.8%Appeal to Authority13.4%This article: 27.7%Joe Chalfant: 3.2%Townhall: 1.9%False Dilemma27.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 27.2%Joe Chalfant: 13.0%Townhall: 9.4%Hasty Generalization27.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 1.8%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.7%Townhall: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 20.5%Joe Chalfant: 12.2%Townhall: 10.4%Appeal to Emotion20.5%This article: 11.6%Joe Chalfant: 1.9%Townhall: 2.1%Begging the Question11.6%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 3.0%Townhall: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.5%Joe Chalfant: 1.0%Townhall: 1.6%Anecdotal8.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.2%Joe Chalfant: 2.6%Townhall: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 1.6%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.5%Joe Chalfant: 2.6%Townhall: 3.0%Unattributed Quote8.5%This article: 6.3%Joe Chalfant: 0.7%Townhall: 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection6.3%This article: 37.5%Joe Chalfant: 27.6%Townhall: 15.6%Biased Writer Voice37.5%This article: 13.4%Joe Chalfant: 7.9%Townhall: 5.1%Indoctrination13.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Chalfant: 0.0%Townhall: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 41.5%Joe Chalfant: 22.7%Townhall: 13.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias41.5%This article: 19.6%Joe Chalfant: 14.6%Townhall: 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…19.6%

224 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker8.5%attributed speech205writer words
Selected voice

Carrington

100%flagged-word coverage
19 attributed words100% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Carrington: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning -45.4 ptsWriter: 45.4%Carrington: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-41.0 ptsWriter: 41.0%Carrington: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -21.5 ptsWriter: 21.5%Carrington: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-14.6 ptsWriter: 14.6%Carrington: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.8 ptsWriter: 6.8%Carrington: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.