The Drive52%

Heavy-Duty Pickups Lead List of America’s Deadliest Vehicles to Other Drivers 54%

By Adam Ismail75%

7/30/2026, 9:15:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 616 faulty-reasoning hits from 425 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.5% and a BS Rank of 54% (13,032 of 27,909 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the article peer group.

The disparity in vehicle size is a major concern on America’s roads, particularly as passenger cars trend bigger and heavier , with electrified models pushing curb weights up even further. 
On Thursday, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety published a list of the most dangerous vehicles to crash in as well as get hit by , which is a level of detail the group rarely explores, but is extremely important. 
IIHS calls this the “other-driver death rate.” 
It’s expressed in the number of deaths per million registered vehicle years—not to drivers in that car, but to whoever they collide with. 
The study incorporates data from 2021 through 2024, and mostly concerns 2023 model-year vehicles. 
Unsurprisingly, heavy-duty trucks and muscle cars dominate the top of this list. 
Per IIHS, a Ram 3500 Crew Cab Long Bed is the last vehicle you want to crash into, with a calculated other-driver death rate of 204 deaths per million registered years. 
Second and third are both Dodge Chargers, at 161 and 136, respectively, with the V8 model claiming more lives. 
Then there’s the Chevy Silverado 3500 Crew Cab (126), two Ram 1500s (124, 113), and a 2500 (113). 
The first SUV doesn’t appear in the list until the No. 10 spot, and it’s the Cadillac XT5 (100). 
And, strangely, we don’t see a Ford pickup—the F-150 SuperCrew—appear until No. 
12. 
When we flip to the worst cars to be inside during a crash, this list is also full of the usual suspects, and you can likely guess many of them. 
The Kia Rio and Nissan Versa far and away lead the running, with death rates of 170 and 164 per million registered years, respectively. 
Those were followed by the Chrysler 300 (132), rather surprisingly, and then Dodge Charger (127) and Challenger (125). 
This of course gives the Charger the unenviable distinction of being a vehicle that is both statistically more dangerous to be inside in the event of a crash, as well as increasing the chances of another driver dying whenever one is involved. 
The vehicles with the lowest rates of other-driver deaths, as IIHS notes, don’t correlate in terms of size but definitely present a bias toward luxury makes, such as BMW, Volvo, Mercedes, and Porsche. 
Presumably, these cars have the best slate of active safety features, demonstrating that safety tech does indeed make a difference on the outcome of a collision. 
You can take a look at the full results over at the IIHS’ website . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.6%Adam Ismail: 5.0%The Drive: 2.5%Confirmation Bias22.6%This article: 7.3%Adam Ismail: 1.6%The Drive: 0.8%Anchoring Bias7.3%This article: 9.9%Adam Ismail: 3.6%The Drive: 3.1%Availability Heuristic9.9%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.4%The Drive: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.0%The Drive: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 2.0%The Drive: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 5.1%The Drive: 3.7%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.0%The Drive: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.6%The Drive: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 4.0%The Drive: 2.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Adam Ismail: 2.6%The Drive: 1.6%Pessimism Bias7.1%This article: 15.3%Adam Ismail: 8.8%The Drive: 5.3%Negativity Bias15.3%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 2.2%The Drive: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.5%The Drive: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.3%The Drive: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.6%The Drive: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.1%The Drive: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Adam Ismail: 3.2%The Drive: 2.1%Halo Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.1%The Drive: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.7%Adam Ismail: 1.9%The Drive: 1.0%Recency Bias8.7%This article: 2.8%Adam Ismail: 0.4%The Drive: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.4%Adam Ismail: 4.4%The Drive: 2.6%Appeal to Authority9.4%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.8%The Drive: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.9%The Drive: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.6%Adam Ismail: 7.7%The Drive: 5.3%Hasty Generalization10.6%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.4%The Drive: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.6%Adam Ismail: 5.3%The Drive: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion2.6%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.1%The Drive: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 13.2%Adam Ismail: 1.8%The Drive: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.2%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.4%The Drive: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.3%The Drive: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 9.9%Adam Ismail: 0.3%The Drive: 0.2%Composition/Division9.9%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 3.6%The Drive: 2.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.1%The Drive: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Adam Ismail: 2.3%The Drive: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.5%The Drive: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.8%The Drive: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 2.0%The Drive: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.8%Adam Ismail: 1.1%The Drive: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection2.8%This article: 12.0%Adam Ismail: 13.5%The Drive: 8.4%Biased Writer Voice12.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.3%The Drive: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.1%The Drive: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.6%The Drive: 2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

425 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.