BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Recency Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 441 faulty-reasoning hits from 448 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23% and a BS Rank of 14% (26,134 of 30,209 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the article peer group.

Two uncontested races for two school board seats won’t appear on the November ballot if additional candidates do not emerge. 
Incumbent Patrice Marshall McKenzie and candidate Dennis McNamara have qualified for seats in districts 5 and 7 respectively and so far are running unopposed. 
In accordance with Education Code Section 5328, the pair would be seated as if elected if no one else qualifies for the election. 
Earlier this year, the Pasadena Unified School District (PUSD) passed a resolution adopting an education code that allows the Los Angeles County Registrar’s Office to cancel uncontested races as a cost saving measure. 
The canceled races would save the school district approximately $60,000 to $75,000 for each race canceled. 
Several other school districts including the Arcadia Unified School District have canceled uncontested races. 
Locally, the clock is ticking. 
Prospective candidates have until close of business Friday, Aug. 7 to turn in completed nomination papers with the required signatures to qualify for the ballot if an incumbent files for reelection, which means District 5 incumbent McKenzie could become an instant winner this week. 
“If no one else files then it will be an ‘appointment in lieu of election’ because it saves the district dollars,” McKenzie told Pasadena Now. 
In McNamara’s race things are a little different. 
Incumbent Yarma Velazquez did not seek reelection in District 7, the filing period automatically extends five days for candidates other than the incumbent under California election law. 
The extended filing period closes at 5 p.m. 
Aug. 
12. 
If no one files he too would become an instant winner. 
According to EdSource, an online magazine which provides information on the state of education, the state is seeing more unopposed races. 
In 2024 there were 851 races in 49 counties that did not appear on the ballot due to unopposed races. 
In some cases, no one qualified to run for the seat. 
EdSource analyzed data from 1,510 races. 
In Los Angeles County, that same year, 252 candidates ran for 174 seats. 
Ninety seats had only one candidate and did not appear on the ballot. 
Locally in 2024, Trustee Scott Harden ran unopposed, but appeared on the ballot because the district had not yet adopted the resolution to remove unopposed races from the ballot. 
“I certainly appreciate the electoral process and to have members of the public see a statement by a candidate. 
On the other hand, there is a significant cost saving to the district in not having to facilitate an election that is uncontested,” said Harden. 
Locally, two other seats will be decided by voters this year. 
Both contests have two people vying for the seats. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 1.3%Pasadena Now: 1.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.5%Pasadena Now: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 3.9%Pasadena Now: 2.2%Availability Heuristic7.6%This article: 4.5%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.7%Pasadena Now: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic4.5%This article: 6.5%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.3%Pasadena Now: 0.3%Hindsight Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 4.3%Pasadena Now: 3.6%Framing Effect2.5%This article: 3.6%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 2.3%Pasadena Now: 1.3%Loss Aversion3.6%This article: 3.1%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 1.7%Pasadena Now: 0.8%Status Quo Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.3%Pasadena Now: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.6%Pasadena Now: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 2.1%Pasadena Now: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 2.5%Pasadena Now: 2.0%Negativity Bias1.1%This article: 11.2%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 3.9%Pasadena Now: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias11.2%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.2%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.2%Pasadena Now: 2.1%Halo Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.8%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.8%Pasadena Now: 0.3%Recency Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.6%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.1%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.4%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 4.1%Pasadena Now: 2.9%Appeal to Authority13.4%This article: 2.5%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 2.5%Pasadena Now: 0.8%False Dilemma2.5%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 1.5%Pasadena Now: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.4%Pasadena Now: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.7%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 1.1%Pasadena Now: 1.3%Hasty Generalization4.7%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.1%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.7%Pasadena Now: 0.2%Bandwagon3.1%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 5.4%Pasadena Now: 3.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.8%Pasadena Now: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.5%Pasadena Now: 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 3.1%Pasadena Now: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.3%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.5%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.6%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Composition/Division4.5%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.6%Pasadena Now: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.5%Pasadena Now: 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 1.1%Pasadena Now: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.4%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.7%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 1.0%Pasadena Now: 0.9%Unattributed Quote4.7%This article: 5.6%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 1.1%Pasadena Now: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection5.6%This article: 2.5%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 1.0%Pasadena Now: 1.4%Biased Writer Voice2.5%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%ANDRÉ COLEMAN: 0.1%Pasadena Now: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.6%

448 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers15%attributed speech379writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
25 attributed words36% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Patrice Marshall McKenzie: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Patrice Marshall McKenzie: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Patrice Marshall McKenzie: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Patrice Marshall McKenzie: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.