Machias Planning Board gives OK for North Street golf simulator construction 4%

By Evan W. Houk11%

8/7/2026, 10:38:13 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 131 faulty-reasoning hits from 575 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of 4% (28,875 of 29,795 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the article peer group.

The property behind the former Community of Christ Church at 54 North St. in Machias is expected to become home to a golf and sports simulator, tentatively named Salty Swing, after the Planning Board approved a building permit Wednesday for owners Seth Kilton and Katie McDonald. 
Photo by Evan W. 
Houk. 
MACHIAS  The Machias Planning Board approved a building permit Wednesday for a golf simulator proposed for the property behind the former Community of Christ Church at 54 North St. 
The business, tentatively named Salty Swing, previously drew resistance from North Street residents concerned about increased traffic and its liquor license application. 
The Select Board approved that license July 22, and the application now moves to the state for review. 
No residents attended Wednesday’s meeting to comment on the building permit. 
Planning Board Chair Harry Flower said the application was complete and required little discussion. 
“Any queries?” 
he asked the board. 
Seth Kilton and his partner, Katie McDonald, own apartments in the area and operate Lake Smoke Farms and Tantastic Energy & Wellness, both in Machias. 
They also own the former Community of Christ Church building, which Kilton said they plan to convert into apartments. 
He told the board that construction on the sports simulator may begin this summer, and he hopes to open by next summer. 
The building is expected to be a 32‑by‑48‑foot structure behind the former Community of Christ Church, Kilton said after the meeting, adding that Salty Swing may not be the final name for the golf and sports simulator. 
“I just needed a name for the liquor license application,” he said. 
The building permit lists 16 to 20 parking spaces. 
The sports simulator is expected to include three bays where four to six people can play games, drink and order food. 
The Planning Board also approved two additional building permits for new hangars at the town‑owned Machias Valley Airport. 
One permit is for Maine Air Physician Services LLC, and the other is for MSAC Properties LLC, owned by Michael Radeka, a licensed pilot and chair of Friends of Machias Valley Airport. 
The larger MSAC hangar  an 80‑by‑80‑foot structure  received conditional approval pending review by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. 
The Maine Air Physician Services hangar is expected to be a 50‑by‑40‑foot building. 
This is Radeka’s second approved hangar and the third approved in Machias since voters authorized long‑term land leases at a special town meeting last December. 
A Cessna Citation private jet, second from right, is parked among aircraft at the Machias Valley Municipal Airport. 
The Machias Planning Board approved two new hangars for the airport Wednesday. 
Photo by Evan W. 
Houk. 
Town Manager Sarah Craighead Dedmon said the companies building the hangars are leasing airport land from Machias for 20 years at 12 cents per square foot, and the town expects increased property tax revenue once the hangars are built. 
She said the ability to lease airport land, along with the recently completed taxi lane, has opened the door for more hangar construction. 
She also noted that the airport needs additional “based aircraft,” as only three are officially based in Machias now. 
Plans call for extending the taxi lane in the future to accommodate more hangars. 
“There’s huge demand for hangars in Maine,” Craighead Dedmon said. 
The Machias Planning Board’s next meeting is scheduled for 5 p.m. 
Wednesday, Sept. 2, at the Town Office. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.6%The Maine Monitor: 1.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Evan W. Houk: 1.1%The Maine Monitor: 2.0%Availability Heuristic1.7%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.6%The Maine Monitor: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 5.4%The Maine Monitor: 3.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.4%The Maine Monitor: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.4%The Maine Monitor: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.3%Evan W. Houk: 4.5%The Maine Monitor: 2.2%Optimism Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.4%The Maine Monitor: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 4.8%The Maine Monitor: 5.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Evan W. Houk: 2.3%The Maine Monitor: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.5%The Maine Monitor: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.5%The Maine Monitor: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.7%The Maine Monitor: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.4%The Maine Monitor: 1.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 2.7%The Maine Monitor: 1.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.8%The Maine Monitor: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 2.5%The Maine Monitor: 2.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.0%Evan W. Houk: 1.2%The Maine Monitor: 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.5%The Maine Monitor: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.5%The Maine Monitor: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 1.2%The Maine Monitor: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.6%The Maine Monitor: 0.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.0%The Maine Monitor: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Evan W. Houk: 0.4%The Maine Monitor: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

575 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers35%attributed speech374writer words
79%flagged-word coverage
91 attributed words45% of attributed speech0% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.