KUER⁠84%

April 16 — KUER Pint Night: HK Brewing ⁠83%

By KUER 90.1⁠0%

2/21/2026, 11:21:00 AM

Topics: Events

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 60.8% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 162 faulty-reasoning hits from 143 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,796 of 27,608 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the article peer group.

On Thursday, April 16, KUER is taking over HK Brewing in Salt Lake City for Pint Night — 6 to 9 p.m. 
Stop by, meet Station Manager Cristy Meiners, Assistant News Director Caroline Ballard and other KUER staff. 
HK Brewing is pouring beers and $4 draft kombucha all night. 
And for a $20 donation, you can snag an exclusive pint glass marking KUER's 65th anniversary. 
This custom KUER pint glass is only available in person at Pint Night. 
Come for the drinks. 
Stay for the conversation. 
Support local journalism while you're at it. 
Spring Pint Night: HK Brewing 
Thursday, April 16, 2026 | 6 p.m. - 9 p.m. 
NOTE: This venue is 21+ 
370 Aspen Ave, Salt Lake City 
Can't make it? 
Come see us at our Mug Stop at Neighborhood Hive on April 18. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.3%KUER: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.5%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 4.7%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.2%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.3%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.5%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%KUER 90.1: 5.8%KUER: 7.3%Framing Effect11.2%This article: 20.3%KUER 90.1: 1.7%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion20.3%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.4%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 3.0%KUER: 4.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.9%KUER: 2.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 2.5%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.6%KUER: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%KUER 90.1: 1.2%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.0%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%KUER 90.1: 2.5%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect9.1%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%KUER 90.1: 1.3%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.9%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 2.7%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.9%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.2%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 2.4%KUER: 5.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.2%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.1%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.3%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.5%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 3.9%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.0%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.3%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.6%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.6%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 6.4%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 4.9%KUER 90.1: 3.8%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination4.9%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 60.8%KUER 90.1: 26.3%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…60.8%

143 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker7.7%attributed speech132writer words
Selected voice

HK Brewing

100%flagged-word coverage
11 attributed words100% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +42.4 ptsWriter: 57.6%HK Brewing: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-5.3 ptsWriter: 5.3%HK Brewing: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.