BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 1,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 947 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.5% and a BS Rank of 34% (20,439 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the article peer group.

With San Antonio staring down a $158 million budget deficit, Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones devoted much of a town hall Wednesday night to preparing residents for difficult financial decisions ahead  including defending her proposal to ask voters to end the city’s Ready to Work program early instead of raising property taxes. 
Speaking to dozens of District 1 residents at Edison High School, Jones argued the city should exhaust every available option before asking taxpayers to pay more, describing a financial outlook she said has worsened in recent weeks. 
“We’ve got a $158 million budget gap,” Jones said. 
“For context, if you closed every library, if you closed all of Animal Care Services, if you took all of the money in the general fund out regarding public health, you’d still have to go find another $20 million.” 
Jones said after meeting with City Manager Erik Walsh earlier Wednesday, the proposed budget scheduled for release Aug. 13 is expected to include even deeper cuts than council members had previously anticipated, though she declined to identify which programs could face additional reductions before the proposal is unveiled. 
She added that the city’s next bond program  which funds major capital projects like streets, sidewalks, drainage improvements and parks  is now expected to be significantly smaller than originally projected because property values have not grown as anticipated. 
“This is how we get after those projects, drainage, in infrastructure projects, parks, etc. 
In the 2022 bond, we had a $1.2 billion dollar capacity,” she said. 
“This year, we were expecting ideally something similar, but based on where property values are, we were initially at $600 million. 
We will now be south of $600 million.” 
Jones said the combination of a shrinking bond program and widening budget deficit has forced city leaders to reconsider ideas that may have previously been politically untouchable. 
Chief among the ideas she's pushing is asking voters to allow the city to redirect roughly $100 million remaining in the Ready to Work program. 
Approved by voters in 2020, the program is funded through a one-eighth-cent sales tax and was created to help residents earn workforce credentials and secure higher-paying jobs after the economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. 
While state law limits how the remaining sales tax revenue can be spent, Jones said several eligible programs  including literacy promotion, after-school programs and job training initiatives  are currently funded through the city’s general fund. 
Redirecting Ready to Work dollars to those programs with voters' approval, she said, would free up general fund money for public safety, street maintenance and drainage projects. 
Where council stands on Ready to Work 
Jones would need six votes, including her own, to put the question to voters. 
She would need to find three more “yes” votes ahead of Aug. 17 to meet the November ballot deadline. 
Councilmembers Sukh Kaur (D1), Phyllis Viagran (D3), Teri Castillo (D5) and Ivalis Meza Gonzalez (D8) have all said they don’t want to end the Ready to Work program early. 
Two conservative voices on the council, Misty Spears (D9) and Marc Whyte (D10), both expressed support for the idea. 
Councilmembers Edward Mungia (D4) and Marina Alderete Gavito (D7) have expressed openness to discuss the proposal while Jalen McKee Rodriguez (D2) and Ric Galvan (D6) have not publicly taken a stance. 
Speaking to the press after the town hall, Jones said the scale of the deficit requires creative thinking like looking at the Ready to Work budget. 
“People are talking about raising garage sale permits. 
What are we going to raise them to? 
$25,000 apiece? 
Let's be serious,” Jones said. 
“My priority remains not raising people's property taxes in this very difficult time. 
So yeah, we're going to go through the intellectual exercise.” 
Not every community member at Wednesday’s town hall was ready to support ending Ready to Work early. 
District 6 resident Elijah Serena said he wants more information before deciding whether redirecting the remaining funds is the right approach. 
“I don’t necessarily wholeheartedly agree with it or disagree with it,” Serena said. 
“I need to see what that funding would be going to if it were to be redirected  where would it go, and in what amounts?” 
Serena said he has questioned whether Ready to Work duplicates the workforce training already available through organizations like Alamo Colleges, but said he would need to see evidence that the program isn’t filling a unique role before he'd vote to end it early. 
Looking for cuts 
Jones also reiterated her recent call for corporations, foundations and philanthropists to help cover the cost of nonprofit organizations that currently receive city funding, arguing taxpayers shouldn’t be asked to pay more before the city seeks private support. 
Last month, Jones floated eliminating city funding for nonprofits that charge admission, including the San Antonio Botanical Garden and San Antonio Book Festival. 
Wednesday, she doubled down. 
“I have yet to meet the person that says, ‘Yes, please raise my property tax so you can give the Botanical Garden a million dollars,’” Jones said, drawing applause from many in the packed cafeteria. 
While the budget discussion dominated much of the nearly hour-long town hall, residents also questioned Jones and city department leaders about everything from homelessness, pedestrian safety, Animal Care Services, neighborhood infrastructure projects, data centers and the city’s response to federal immigration enforcement. 
The proposed budget is scheduled for release Aug. 13, with City Council expected to spend the coming weeks debating spending cuts, potential revenue increases and whether to place the Ready to Work measure before voters ahead of the Aug. 17 ballot deadline. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.8%Diego Medel: 2.0%San Antonio Report: 1.2%Confirmation Bias7.8%This article: 1.0%Diego Medel: 1.2%San Antonio Report: 0.5%Anchoring Bias1.0%This article: 9.5%Diego Medel: 1.4%San Antonio Report: 1.5%Availability Heuristic9.5%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.5%San Antonio Report: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.2%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.4%San Antonio Report: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Diego Medel: 4.4%San Antonio Report: 3.2%Framing Effect5.4%This article: 2.9%Diego Medel: 1.1%San Antonio Report: 0.7%Loss Aversion2.9%This article: 1.4%Diego Medel: 1.6%San Antonio Report: 1.0%Status Quo Bias1.4%This article: 2.9%Diego Medel: 0.5%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect2.9%This article: 2.2%Diego Medel: 2.9%San Antonio Report: 2.4%Optimism Bias2.2%This article: 10.1%Diego Medel: 1.3%San Antonio Report: 0.9%Pessimism Bias10.1%This article: 11.0%Diego Medel: 3.9%San Antonio Report: 2.2%Negativity Bias11.0%This article: 8.2%Diego Medel: 1.9%San Antonio Report: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.4%San Antonio Report: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Diego Medel: 0.5%San Antonio Report: 0.7%In-Group Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.8%San Antonio Report: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Diego Medel: 0.9%San Antonio Report: 0.5%Recency Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.5%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Diego Medel: 0.2%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.2%San Antonio Report: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.3%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.0%Diego Medel: 3.6%San Antonio Report: 1.4%Appeal to Authority4.0%This article: 8.0%Diego Medel: 2.4%San Antonio Report: 1.0%False Dilemma8.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.2%San Antonio Report: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.7%San Antonio Report: 1.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.6%Diego Medel: 0.4%San Antonio Report: 0.3%Bandwagon2.6%This article: 8.1%Diego Medel: 2.6%San Antonio Report: 2.4%Appeal to Emotion8.1%This article: 2.9%Diego Medel: 0.3%San Antonio Report: 0.3%Begging the Question2.9%This article: 7.1%Diego Medel: 1.9%San Antonio Report: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.1%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.3%Diego Medel: 0.6%San Antonio Report: 0.3%Burden of Proof7.3%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.2%San Antonio Report: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.4%San Antonio Report: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.7%San Antonio Report: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.4%Diego Medel: 0.3%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Middle Ground1.4%This article: 0.5%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.5%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.1%Diego Medel: 1.1%San Antonio Report: 0.4%Unattributed Quote5.1%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.6%Diego Medel: 0.9%San Antonio Report: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice7.6%This article: 1.1%Diego Medel: 3.2%San Antonio Report: 1.2%Indoctrination1.1%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.0%San Antonio Report: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Diego Medel: 0.9%San Antonio Report: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

947 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers63%attributed speech354writer words
97%flagged-word coverage
490 attributed words83% of attributed speech38% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice+14.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones: 14.7%14.7%Unattributed Quote+9.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones: 9.8%9.8%Indoctrination+2.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones: 2.0%2.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.