Street homelessness went up in Los Angeles. In Nithya Raman's district, it was nearly cut in half 58%

By Noah Goldberg64%

7/24/2026, 6:04:17 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 37.5% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 1,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 646 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (11,318 of 26,656 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the article peer group.

Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman, who is running for mayor against incumbent Karen Bass, seized on significant decreases in street homelessness in her district Friday while blasting increases citywide. 
Street homelessness  people living outdoors or in their vehicles  went down by 49% in Raman’s district compared to the previous year, she said at a press conference Friday. 
Citywide, street homelessness increased nearly 8%, while overall homelessness, which includes those living in shelters and other temporary facilities, increased 3.4%, according to numbers from the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority's January point-in-time count that were released Friday. 
The contrast between her district and the city overall offered Raman an angle to present herself as more effectively handling the homelessness crisis than Bass. 
An estimated 45,194 homeless people live in the city, with about 36% of them in shelters, according to LAHSA. 
“Far fewer people living outside. 
Far more people indoors,” Raman, who has served on the council since 2020 and is chair of the City Council's housing and homelessness committee, said at the press conference. 
“As mayor, that is the approach, and the results, that I want to deliver citywide.” 
The numbers across the city were a setback for Bass, who has made homelessness one of her signature issues and previously touted two straight years of drops in street homelessness. 
Raman cited her office's homelessness team and their “aggressive interventionist” approach as reasons her district  which extends from Los Feliz and Silver Lake into Studio City, Sherman Oaks and other parts of the San Fernando Valley  did not suffer the same increases as other parts of the city. 
She said her team is very familiar with homeless individuals in the district and knows many by name. 
The team tracks homeless encampments on a map and makes sure that empty shelter beds are filled, she said. 
Bass' campaign said Raman was attacking the mayor's Inside Safe program, which moves homeless people from the streets to shelter and motel beds, at the same time that it contributed to the decreases in her district. 
Raman has critiqued Inside Safe as too costly and insufficiently transparent. 
“Nithya Raman is taking credit for the results of Inside Safe while campaigning against it,” Alex Stack, a spokesperson for Bass' campaign, said in a statement. 
“While Raman takes credit for the City’s work in her district, ignoring the fact that she’s the Chair of the Homelessness & Housing Committee for ALL of Los Angeles, Mayor Bass is working to move our city forward and address years of neglect.” 
Raman responded to those critiques at her press conference, saying that her district only had three Inside Safe operations over the past four years  fewer than some other districts. 
She deflected when asked Friday about her responsibility for citywide homelessness, as chair of the city's housing and homelessness committee. 
“Council can pass legislation ... move motions forward, but it is the mayor that has charge of the implementation and outcomes,” she said. 
Citywide, Inside Safe has moved more than 6,000 people into hotels, motels and other types of interim housing since Bass took office in December 2022. 
But by May 31, 41% of those people had returned to homelessness, according to LAHSA figures collected separately from this year’s homeless count. 
Bass attributed the citywide homelessness increases in part to funding cuts by the state and federal government. 
She also said the county has not provided adequate mental health or substance counseling services. 
“This crisis was ignored by city leaders for decades, it’s only now that we’ve seen a historic decline,” she said in a statement Thursday. 
“I will never stop fighting until we end street homelessness, because no Angeleno should be sleeping on the street.” 
Times staff writer Doug Smith contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.0%Noah Goldberg: 2.9%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Confirmation Bias17.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Noah Goldberg: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 3.3%Availability Heuristic2.9%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.7%Noah Goldberg: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Hindsight Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Noah Goldberg: 8.1%Daily Pilot: 6.9%Framing Effect11.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.7%Noah Goldberg: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Status Quo Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.3%Noah Goldberg: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 3.3%Optimism Bias5.3%This article: 3.7%Noah Goldberg: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Pessimism Bias3.7%This article: 12.1%Noah Goldberg: 7.6%Daily Pilot: 7.4%Negativity Bias12.1%This article: 37.5%Noah Goldberg: 4.2%Daily Pilot: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias37.5%This article: 3.6%Noah Goldberg: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.6%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Noah Goldberg: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias5.6%This article: 2.8%Noah Goldberg: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 4.7%Halo Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.8%Noah Goldberg: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Noah Goldberg: 2.4%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem10.7%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.7%Noah Goldberg: 2.8%Daily Pilot: 4.6%Appeal to Authority6.7%This article: 8.0%Noah Goldberg: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 1.1%False Dilemma8.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.6%Noah Goldberg: 3.8%Daily Pilot: 4.1%Hasty Generalization4.6%This article: 3.9%Noah Goldberg: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring3.9%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.7%Noah Goldberg: 4.6%Daily Pilot: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion6.7%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 26.8%Noah Goldberg: 2.8%Daily Pilot: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)26.8%This article: 9.6%Noah Goldberg: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque9.6%This article: 9.1%Noah Goldberg: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof9.1%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 2.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 3.7%Noah Goldberg: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman3.7%This article: 4.3%Noah Goldberg: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.3%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.8%Noah Goldberg: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.8%This article: 0.8%Noah Goldberg: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.8%This article: 4.6%Noah Goldberg: 3.0%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Biased Writer Voice4.6%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Noah Goldberg: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

646 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers68%attributed speech205writer words
Selected voice

Bass' campaign

100%flagged-word coverage
36 attributed words8.2% of attributed speech90% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.