Wildfire smoke may have cleared, but mental health impacts can linger 59%

By Shannon Pineau72%

8/7/2026, 1:29:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 1,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 612 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (12,519 of 30,190 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the article peer group.

Planet Detroit’s Voices column includes opinion pieces from our community of partners and readers. 
These pieces express the voices of the authors and not necessarily those of the publication. 
With wildfire smoke suffocating the state last month, the haze set an eerie tone. 
The streets were scant, birds were quiet, and many canceled summer plans. 
As the air quality index climbed into hazardous levels, health officials advised the public to stay inside, keep our windows shut, run air filtration systems, and wear N-95 masks if we must venture outside. 
Now that the smoke has cleared, it’s easy to forget the profound impacts these wildfire events have on our health and well-being. 
Most media coverage focused on the hazardous levels of air pollutants like fine particulate matter, including PM2.5 and PM10. 
Exposure to these toxic particles can trigger acute asthma attacks , increase the incidence of heart attacks and strokes , and lead to more pre-term deliveries , among other adverse health impacts. 
But these kinds of unnatural disasters, increasing in their frequency and severity, also weigh heavily on our psyche, bringing up anxiety, grief and anger. 
As a therapist, I have held clients’ fears as they envision full seasons of wildfire smoke, spending summer indoors instead of on the lakes and rivers they have enjoyed their whole lives. 
Anticipatory grief arises as clients consider their children’s or grandchildren’s uncertain futures, wondering whether they will enjoy their summer breaks smoke-free, hands stained and covered in dirt from picking fruit and digging for worms. 
Teen clients have expressed anger that previous generations have not done more to protect the planet. 
The American Psychological Association, in a 2020 survey , found that two-thirds of Americans (67%) are somewhat or extremely anxious about the impact of climate change on the planet, and more than half (55%) are somewhat or extremely anxious about its impact on their own mental health. 
It’s normal to feel deep concern about the health of our planet, but the impact of climate change on our mental health has the potential to impair daily functioning. 
Exposure to wildfire smoke has been linked to an increase in emergency department visits for depression, anxiety, and other mood-affective disorders. 
But taking action can help prevent despair and mitigate the impact of climate change. 
Joining groups working toward climate solutions in your community can help move the needle on climate change with collective action while inspiring you and expanding your social network. 
I also tell my clients not to hesitate in asking for  or offering  support. 
There is no shame in turning to friends, family members, or neighbors for help, especially if you have any health conditions that are exacerbated by wildfire smoke. 
Engaging in social support helps build community, making you and your network more resilient to challenges. 
Deepening your connection to nature can also help reduce stress and improve your mood and attention . 
You may also feel more called to engage in climate activism to protect the Earth you care deeply about. 
As someone who has lost sleep worrying about the sustainability of the planet for my growing toddler, involvement in organizations like the Michigan Clinicians for Climate Action has helped me to feel more hopeful and less alone. 
I am also learning how to integrate climate work into my therapy practice , and believe that everyone can apply their unique skills toward climate solutions. 
Finally, if anxiety, post-traumatic stress, sleep disturbances, or other mental health symptoms are impacting your daily life, reach out for professional support. 
Talk with a therapist, health professional, or someone else you trust about your concerns. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Shannon Pineau: 5.2%Associated Press: 2.1%Availability Heuristic13.6%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Shannon Pineau: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias4.2%This article: 13.4%Shannon Pineau: 4.5%Associated Press: 3.4%Framing Effect13.4%This article: 4.4%Shannon Pineau: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.4%Loss Aversion4.4%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.3%Shannon Pineau: 3.5%Associated Press: 2.9%Optimism Bias9.3%This article: 9.2%Shannon Pineau: 3.7%Associated Press: 1.2%Pessimism Bias9.2%This article: 17.0%Shannon Pineau: 6.7%Associated Press: 4.6%Negativity Bias17.0%This article: 6.0%Shannon Pineau: 3.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 5.2%Shannon Pineau: 1.3%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.7%Shannon Pineau: 1.9%Associated Press: 2.0%Appeal to Authority7.7%This article: 5.9%Shannon Pineau: 1.5%Associated Press: 0.5%False Dilemma5.9%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.6%Shannon Pineau: 3.9%Associated Press: 1.7%Hasty Generalization11.6%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.6%Shannon Pineau: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Bandwagon4.6%This article: 2.6%Shannon Pineau: 2.6%Associated Press: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion2.6%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.7%Shannon Pineau: 2.2%Associated Press: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.7%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 21.7%Shannon Pineau: 11.6%Associated Press: 1.4%Anecdotal21.7%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.5%Shannon Pineau: 1.9%Associated Press: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.5%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 8.8%Shannon Pineau: 2.2%Associated Press: 1.1%Biased Writer Voice8.8%This article: 23.4%Shannon Pineau: 12.4%Associated Press: 1.8%Indoctrination23.4%This article: 3.1%Shannon Pineau: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shannon Pineau: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

612 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker7.7%attributed speech565writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words100% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Indoctrination-25.3 ptsWriter: 25.3%American Psychological Association: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.6 ptsWriter: 9.6%American Psychological Association: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-3.4 ptsWriter: 3.4%American Psychological Association: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.