BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 172 hits. Analysis detected 1,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,154 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32% and a BS Rank of 28% (21,530 of 29,795 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the article peer group.

The Del Mar City Council on Monday held a hastily scheduled meeting in the middle of the afternoon that lasted 10 minutes and included one agenda item. 
That item was the Council voting 3-0 to request a formal investigation by county and federal prosecutors into state Attorney General Rob Bonta and a member of the Del Mar Fairgrounds board. 
The subject of the requested investigation? 
Allegations that both Bonta and the Fairgrounds board member may have sought to block a proposed affordable housing development on Fairgrounds property because they have ties to one of the developers behind a controversial rival housing project. 
As our Tigist Layne reports, the request to bring in prosecutors is the latest escalation in Del Mar’s ongoing housing battles. 
The city is among several coastal cities that have tried to block housing development and criticized state housing mandates. 
Councilmembers and Del Mar City Manager Ashley Jones said the city was simply following up on a letter from a concerned resident, who pointed out ties between Bonta, the board member and the rival project developer. 
Nonsense, said an attorney for the rival project. 
The city’s request for an investigation was an attempt to “threaten the project and state officials based on misconstrued, incomplete and unsubstantiated assertions.” 
No word yet on whether County District Attorney Summer Stephan or U.S. 
Attorney Adam Gordon plan to act on Del Mar’s request. 
Read the full story here. 
City Manager: National City Is Headed Toward Insolvency 
National City’s finances are deeply in the red and the city likely will be unable to pay its bills in as little as four years, City Manager Doug Schulze said Tuesday. 
Schulze made the startling revelation during a heated City Council debate over a proposed business tax increase that could have generated up to $7.5 million in annual revenue. 
Facing intense pushback from city businesses, a divided Council voted to nix the proposed tax increase. 
It instead approved a plan to work with businesses on an update to the city’s decades-old tax formula. 
Schulze urged councilmembers to act fast. 
The city faces a $13 million deficit this fiscal year and is on track to deplete a key reserve fund by the following fiscal year. 
In recent years, councilmembers have awarded city employees a series of raises, some as high as 20 percent. 
The $19 million increase in personnel costs since 2024 is one of the main reasons city spending has grown by nearly $20 million over the past three fiscal years. 
“By 2030, there is a strong possibility the city is no longer solvent,” Schulze said. 
“I don’t want to sound like I’m trying to scare the Council into something here. 
But…this is a real problem.” 
Learning Curve: Grossmont Teachers Union Backs Challengers 
For years, the union representing teachers in the Grossmont Union High School District was a predictable force in district politics. 
It backed conservative incumbents who won races that generated little attention. 
Then the culture wars came to town. 
Starting a few years ago, the board’s conservative majority launched a series of changes that rocked the district and spurred the union to get more active. 
A fight over librarians brought out the community in force. 
And it prompted union leaders to take a fresh look at district politics. 
This year, the union is backing a slate of challengers to the conservative incumbents. 
It’s a risky move, since, if the challengers lose, the incumbents will still have the power. 
“I don’t think that the [current] board represents East County values,” the union president told our Jakob McWhinney. 
“East County is a very diverse place with many different perspectives and experiences, and a wide range of economic levels as well. 
It’s not all rich white guys.” 
Read the Learning Curve newsletter here. 
Killer Tomatoes Strike Again 
Forget “One Battle After Another.” 
Hands down, the best movie to emerge from San Diego is the 1978 cult classic “Attack of the Killer Tomatoes.” 
The low-budget farce is about, well, exactly what its title says. 
It has spawned three sequels (one of which features a young George Clooney sporting a hideous shaggy mullet) and earned a place of weird honor in cinema history. 
The movie was the creation of Constantine Dillon , a onetime U.S. 
National Parks Service superintendent who grew up in San Diego and began his moviemaking career in high school with a group of friends that included future state legislator Steve Peace. 
Dillon is still here, teaching at San Diego State University’s Lifelong Learning Network and, according to his LinkedIn profile , looking for writing gigs. 
That’s because Dillon just wrapped up his latest project: A new Killer Tomato movie. 
“Attack of the Killer Tomatoes: Organic Intelligence” premieres Friday and includes an entire movie’s worth of bad puns, worse special effects and enough knowing San Diego references to satisfy even the most jaded local cinephile. 
(Jakob, we’re looking at you.) 
KPBS’ Beth Accomando (who herself edited two of the Tomato sequels) has a review . 
Meet the Beat: South County 
We’re excited for you to join us at our next Meet the Beat event . 
It’s an in-person opportunity for you to meet the reporter behind our South Bay newsletter and chat local news with the Voice of San Diego community. 
This month’s event will be hosted by South County Reporter Jim Hinch. 
RSVP below to reserve your spot. 
It’s free and open to the public. 
5:00 p.m.  6:30 p.m. 
Chula Vista Public Library Civic Center Branch Auditorium 
365 F St, Chula Vista, CA 91910 
Disclaimer: The City of Chula Vista Public Library does not advocate nor endorse the views or positions expressed by the users of its facilities. 
San Diego’s bike lane network is difficult to navigate , suffers from gaps in coverage and often dangerous for riders, according to a new study by researchers at San Diego State University. 
(Union-Tribune) 
A UCSD health economist says new federal Medi-Cal rules will require even people with active cancer to work at least 80 hours per month to qualify for federal health benefits. 
(KPBS) 
The wife of a Cal Fire captain found murdered in her Ramona home last year pleaded guilty on Tuesday to the slaying. 
Yolanda Marodi faces 36 years to life in prison for the stabbing death of her wife, Captain Rebecca Marodi. 
(Union-Tribune) 
The leader of a Southern California Edison advisory panel said this week that a proposed network of federal nuclear power facilities could help the utility dispose of 120 steel canisters of nuclear waste stored at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. 
Some of the planned facilities are slated to test nuclear waste recycling methods. 
(Union-Tribune) 
Get your racket on. 
Pickleball is returning to the Gaslamp Quarter. 
(Times of San Diego) 
Want a horse? 
The San Diego Humane Society has 42 up for adoption . 
(Union-Tribune) 
The Morning Report was written by Jim Hinch. 
It was edited by Will Huntsberry. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.5%Voice of San Diego: 1.8%Voice of San Diego: 2.3%Confirmation Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Voice of San Diego: 2.2%Voice of San Diego: 1.9%Availability Heuristic3.4%This article: 3.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic3.5%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Voice of San Diego: 5.4%Voice of San Diego: 4.3%Framing Effect2.4%This article: 2.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Loss Aversion2.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 2.1%Voice of San Diego: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Voice of San Diego: 1.0%Voice of San Diego: 1.0%Pessimism Bias7.3%This article: 9.9%Voice of San Diego: 7.0%Voice of San Diego: 6.6%Negativity Bias9.9%This article: 1.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Voice of San Diego: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 1.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias1.1%This article: 2.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%In-Group Bias2.1%This article: 1.9%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.9%This article: 1.0%Voice of San Diego: 1.2%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%Halo Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.9%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Recency Bias0.4%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.7%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.7%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.9%Voice of San Diego: 1.9%Voice of San Diego: 2.0%Appeal to Authority14.9%This article: 1.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%Voice of San Diego: 0.9%False Dilemma1.4%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.4%Voice of San Diego: 2.7%Voice of San Diego: 3.1%Hasty Generalization1.4%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.7%Voice of San Diego: 2.7%Voice of San Diego: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion2.7%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.4%Voice of San Diego: 1.5%Voice of San Diego: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.9%Voice of San Diego: 1.6%Voice of San Diego: 1.6%Anecdotal0.9%This article: 0.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.5%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 1.0%Voice of San Diego: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.1%Voice of San Diego: 1.6%Voice of San Diego: 1.1%Unattributed Quote3.1%This article: 3.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection3.0%This article: 8.4%Voice of San Diego: 6.5%Voice of San Diego: 5.0%Biased Writer Voice8.4%This article: 1.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.9%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Indoctrination1.3%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Voice of San Diego: 2.0%Voice of San Diego: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.3%

1154 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers18%attributed speech952writer words
Selected voice

union president

100%flagged-word coverage
46 attributed words23% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.2 ptsWriter: 10.2%union president: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.4 ptsWriter: 6.4%union president: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%union president: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.6 ptsWriter: 1.6%union president: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.