‘He is our child’: Tabitha Brown opens up on the shared grief of Black parents over Nolan Wells and how it can establish trauma 49%

By Brandon Caldwell73%

8/5/2026, 3:11:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 803 faulty-reasoning hits from 533 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.4% and a BS Rank of 49% (15,001 of 28,995 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the article peer group.

One month after the teen’s body was discovered near Horn Island, the social media influencer and actress is echoing a sentiment shared by many regarding his case and how parents of young Black men continue to navigate the world despite the pain of loss. 
The disappearance of Nolan Wells has struck a chord with numerous people. 
Whether it be questions regarding interracial friendships and a mother trying to find out what happened to her son, or individuals connected with the teens who were with the 18-year-old defending themselves due to death, feelings regarding his disappearance remain fraught. 
Tabitha Brown understands all of those emotions. 
In a clip shared from her “Fridays with Tabi and Chance” podcast, the social media influencer and actress opened up on how Black America must monitor not only their grief, but their rage in situations similar to the Wells case and how they internalize fear, anxiety and more. 
“Nolan is one of many,” she began. 
“He’s not our child, but he is our child. 
When we see these things happening constantly, it creates rage inside us that we have to  monitor. 
How high and low it will allow us to get. 
Because it can cause us anxiety, depression, anger, fear, things that we’re already living with.” 
She added, “Every time something like this happens, it’s another level. 
It’s another layer added. 
I don’t think we talk about it enough how this affects us mentally and emotionally. 
Because we still have to work. 
We still have to go to school. 
We still have to show up in the world. 
We still have to show up at grocery stores, common areas with people who don’t always see us as human, who don’t value our life  who don’t love us. 
We still have to show up and act like we’re not bothered  just to get through our day.” 
“When I think about how God created us and created us to be here now  I know that means He knew we were strong enough to carry the weight, but it doesn’t mean that it’s not heavy.” 
In a previous clip from the show, Brown’s husband, Chance, spoke about how losing a child can be considered a “threat to a man’s future.” 
“When you take a man’s son away, now you’re taking my future,” he said. 
The ongoing case regarding Wells’ disappearance has undergone several twists and turns since his body was discovered off Horn Island in Mississippi on July 6. 
Three individuals who have reportedly threatened witnesses who were with Wells the day he disappeared have been arrested in states such as California, Ohio and Illinois. 
All three were charged with transmitting threatening communications in interstate commerce. 
One of those charged threatened the stepmother of Warren Hudson, the teen whose father, Dr. 
Benjamin Hudson, raised more than $100K via a GiveSendGo fundraiser in preparation for any potential legal action. 
Wells’ official autopsy has been completed, but has not been publicly released as a grand jury decides on whether charges should be filed in the case. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 3.3%theGrio: 2.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Brandon Caldwell: 0.3%theGrio: 0.4%Anchoring Bias4.9%This article: 7.1%Brandon Caldwell: 3.7%theGrio: 2.4%Availability Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.2%theGrio: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.7%theGrio: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.9%theGrio: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Brandon Caldwell: 7.8%theGrio: 6.2%Framing Effect7.7%This article: 3.2%Brandon Caldwell: 0.8%theGrio: 1.0%Loss Aversion3.2%This article: 4.1%Brandon Caldwell: 0.2%theGrio: 0.3%Status Quo Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.3%theGrio: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.1%Brandon Caldwell: 2.0%theGrio: 1.8%Optimism Bias7.1%This article: 5.4%Brandon Caldwell: 1.7%theGrio: 1.3%Pessimism Bias5.4%This article: 17.3%Brandon Caldwell: 8.1%theGrio: 8.3%Negativity Bias17.3%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 2.7%theGrio: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 1.4%theGrio: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 16.3%Brandon Caldwell: 4.3%theGrio: 1.9%In-Group Bias16.3%This article: 5.6%Brandon Caldwell: 1.6%theGrio: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias5.6%This article: 1.3%Brandon Caldwell: 1.4%theGrio: 1.4%Halo Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.5%theGrio: 0.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.4%theGrio: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 2.8%Brandon Caldwell: 0.1%theGrio: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 1.5%theGrio: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 1.8%theGrio: 2.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.6%Brandon Caldwell: 1.9%theGrio: 1.4%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 3.4%Brandon Caldwell: 0.5%theGrio: 0.5%Slippery Slope3.4%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.3%Brandon Caldwell: 5.5%theGrio: 3.7%Hasty Generalization2.3%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.3%theGrio: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.2%theGrio: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.7%Brandon Caldwell: 6.6%theGrio: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion10.7%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.9%theGrio: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.8%Brandon Caldwell: 1.2%theGrio: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.8%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.3%theGrio: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.7%theGrio: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 7.1%Brandon Caldwell: 0.3%theGrio: 0.1%Appeal to Nature7.1%This article: 5.6%Brandon Caldwell: 0.2%theGrio: 0.2%Composition/Division5.6%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 1.1%theGrio: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.2%theGrio: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.3%Brandon Caldwell: 0.8%theGrio: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.3%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.1%theGrio: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.3%theGrio: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.8%theGrio: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 9.0%Brandon Caldwell: 1.6%theGrio: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection9.0%This article: 8.3%Brandon Caldwell: 1.7%theGrio: 2.3%Biased Writer Voice8.3%This article: 5.6%Brandon Caldwell: 3.3%theGrio: 1.3%Indoctrination5.6%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 2.1%theGrio: 2.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.1%theGrio: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

533 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers40%attributed speech321writer words
Selected voice

Chance

100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words6.6% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Quote-first Misdirection-15.0 ptsWriter: 15.0%Chance: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.7 ptsWriter: 13.7%Chance: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.