EXCLUSIVE: Inside The DOJ Roundtable That’s Quietly Uniting Seven States Against Fraud 33%

By Reagan Reese63%

7/31/2026, 10:19:39 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Indoctrination, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 1,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,006 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (18,210 of 26,881 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the article peer group.

COLUMBIA, S.C.  More than 50 officials from seven southeastern states convened Thursday to sign a data-sharing agreement with the Department of Justice aimed at rooting out fraud. 
Across the seven states, officials have uncovered roughly $350 million in alleged fraud, according to information shared with the Daily Caller. 
Under the Memorandum of Understanding signed Thursday, the states will give the DOJ access to “publicly available corporate registration and public benefits payment data held by these state agencies.” 
It is data officials said will help the department spot fraud patterns faster. 
Colin McDonald, assistant attorney general for the Department of Justice’s National Fraud Enforcement Division, met with dozens of state officials before his press conference to discuss their work and how the federal government could better support it. 
The Daily Caller was the only outlet allowed in the room. 
“To state partners here and across the country is this: the fraud division and our U.S. attorneys’ offices are ready to help you scale your efforts to strengthen your cases and deliver results for the taxpayers of America,” McDonald said at a press conference following the roundtable. 
“Your partnership with us is the antidote to the fraud epidemic facing our nation. 
And my message to the fraudsters is this: Our team is getting bigger, our resolve is getting stronger, and your time is getting shorter,” he added. 
Over the hour-and-a-half meeting, which ran past its scheduled end, officials walked through the progress they’d made uncovering fraud in their states. 
North Carolina asked for “department-wide access to advanced data analytics tools” to help farm data. 
They called on Congress to help combat fraud. 
Others described working across party lines, and some revealed how gangs are using fraud schemes to recruit teenagers. 
Mississippi used the meeting to announce a new fraud task force, made possible by a grant program the DOJ unveiled. 
It is the first such federal grant awarded. 
The room traded notes on how other states could tap the same program. 
“We’re going to be able to have five new prosecutors come in and work specifically on fraud. 
We’ll be able to hire a law enforcement officer specifically on this task force as well, and an analyst,” Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch told the Caller in an interview about the grant. 
“This gives us the opportunity to hire people that are dedicated.” 
South Carolina and North Carolina brought news of their own. 
South Carolina officials announced they had uncovered the largest Medicaid fraud in state history, crediting an unlikely partnership for cracking the case: they worked alongside North Carolina, with an attorney general’s office led by a Democrat. 
“Elected Republican, elected Democrat, state, federal, South Carolina, North Carolina  and if it hadn’t been for our ability to work together with their U.S. 
Attorney’s office  we would not have been able to uncover the largest Medicaid fraud in South Carolina history,” one state official said during the roundtable. 
In an interview, South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson credited his North Carolina counterpart, Jeff Jackson, with making fraud a priority of his administration. 
It was one reason the two states could work together. 
And Wilson said the DOJ has been instrumental in letting states across the country coordinate. 
“When the administration makes it a priority at the federal level, it helps us support our priorities at the state level,” Wilson told the Caller. 
“Knowing that I have a liaison, a person I can call directly, it helps us make it a bigger priority here at the state. 
When we’re out operating by ourselves in the wilderness, we can only do so much.” 
Wilson noted that when fraud crosses a state border, he loses jurisdiction. 
With an assistant attorney general dedicated to fraud, states can now call on the DOJ and its specialized fraud office to bridge that gap. 
“[They] can break down those jurisdictional barriers, those geographic barriers, even the cultural barriers,” he said. 
State officials aren’t the only ones happy to get more resources to fight fraud; federal officials expressed relief to the Caller as well. 
Fraud has been a long-time issue. 
The year prior, the FBI had 21 billion dollars reported to them in fraud, Heith Janke, the FBI assistant director, told the Caller. 
That is a 26% increase from the previous year. 
“We’ve always had dedicated agents that investigated fraud, but not enough. 
We never had enough agent support. 
We never had enough prosecutor support to really tackle all this. 
I think the change is that this administration has said enough’s enough, fraudsters,” Janke told the Caller, adding that they have more agents, analysts and prosecutors under the Trump administration. 
James Harris, Homeland Security of Investigations assistant director, told the Caller that the Trump administration’s focus on fraud has renewed hope among federal agents. 
“If we don’t have the support or the partnerships, you can’t really go too far. 
You just kind of scratch the surface,” Harris told the Caller. 
“But when you have the partnerships and do stuff like we did today, and you have the support, you know, then we can go zero tolerance. 
Then we can then unleash everything that we have,” he added. 
The administration’s focus on fraud came after YouTuber Nick Shirley exposed nearly a dozen Somali-run daycare centers in Minnesota that were not actually providing services. 
The Trump White House later launched a task force dedicated to rooting out fraud across the country. 
The effort has been led by Vice President JD Vance, who McDonald reports to in his newly created position. 
(RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: Trump Admin Intercepts $60 Million In Student Loan Fraud) 
“The fraud-fighting team assembled here today is resolved to work together to break those cycles and bring the fraudsters out into the light,” McDonald said Thursday. 
“When federal prosecutors work with state agencies to share leads, data, strategy, the American people win. 
Better intelligence, better cases, better training, more money returned to victims, and more fraudsters behind bars where they belong,” he continued. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.5%Reagan Reese: 3.1%The Daily Caller: 4.7%Confirmation Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 1.9%The Daily Caller: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Reagan Reese: 2.5%The Daily Caller: 2.4%Availability Heuristic4.2%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Reagan Reese: 3.2%The Daily Caller: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias2.9%This article: 5.3%Reagan Reese: 5.0%The Daily Caller: 8.9%Framing Effect5.3%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.0%Reagan Reese: 5.3%The Daily Caller: 2.3%Optimism Bias14.0%This article: 3.0%Reagan Reese: 1.5%The Daily Caller: 2.1%Pessimism Bias3.0%This article: 1.1%Reagan Reese: 6.8%The Daily Caller: 7.5%Negativity Bias1.1%This article: 10.9%Reagan Reese: 2.0%The Daily Caller: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias10.9%This article: 1.6%Reagan Reese: 1.5%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error1.6%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Reagan Reese: 2.4%The Daily Caller: 1.9%In-Group Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Reagan Reese: 1.9%The Daily Caller: 1.4%Halo Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.4%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.9%Reagan Reese: 5.1%The Daily Caller: 4.1%Appeal to Authority2.9%This article: 4.1%Reagan Reese: 2.4%The Daily Caller: 2.6%False Dilemma4.1%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 2.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.8%Reagan Reese: 2.5%The Daily Caller: 5.8%Hasty Generalization1.8%This article: 1.1%Reagan Reese: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 0.5%Red Herring1.1%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.2%Reagan Reese: 7.1%The Daily Caller: 5.4%Appeal to Emotion7.2%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 1.3%The Daily Caller: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 19.4%Reagan Reese: 3.7%The Daily Caller: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.4%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.6%Reagan Reese: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Burden of Proof2.6%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.5%Reagan Reese: 1.6%The Daily Caller: 1.5%Anecdotal2.5%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.9%Reagan Reese: 0.9%The Daily Caller: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.9%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 3.5%The Daily Caller: 1.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 1.8%The Daily Caller: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 4.8%The Daily Caller: 7.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 7.3%Reagan Reese: 2.1%The Daily Caller: 2.9%Indoctrination7.3%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 3.3%The Daily Caller: 4.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reagan Reese: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1006 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers49%attributed speech513writer words
Selected voice

Colin McDonald

100%flagged-word coverage
150 attributed words30% of attributed speech46% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Indoctrination+48.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Colin McDonald: 48.7%48.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.