Vox67%

Trump’s merely “okay” economy 21%

By Caitlin Dewey51%

7/30/2026, 2:30:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 662 faulty-reasoning hits from 639 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (20,853 of 26,281 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the article peer group.

This story appeared in Today, Explained, a daily newsletter that helps you understand the most compelling news and stories of the day. 
Subscribe here. 
The American economy lost some steam this spring as the war in Iran pushed up energy prices. 
But don’t let that slower growth, or the downer vibes, fool you: The economy is actually…doing all right. 
The latest report out Thursday from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis, which covers the months of April, May, and June, finds that consumers and businesses have been feeling surprisingly spendy, despite the drag of inflation. 
Inflation does remain well above the Federal Reserve’s annual target of 2 percent. 
And a surge in imports  largely semiconductors and other gear related to the AI boom  pulled the economy down on paper. 
Overall, the US gross domestic product expanded at an annual rate of 1.5 percent, slower than economists expected. 
But imports and exports can swing dramatically from quarter to quarter, and cleaner measures of underlying demand (like the dreadfully named “real final sales to private domestic purchasers,” which filters out some of the noise of quarter-to-quarter swings) showed stronger growth. 
“It’s an economy that’s doing okay,” summed one economist to the Washington Post. 
The US economy is surviving Trump 
This raises an obvious question that President Donald Trump somehow has not posted about yet: If the economy is chugging along, does he deserve the credit? 
After all, in addition to these GDP numbers, unemployment is pretty low. 
And wages rose faster than inflation last year, helping offset higher prices. 
But many economists argue that the economy has held up despite Trump’s policies, not because of them. 
Without Trump’s meddling, today’s “okay” economy might have been fantastic. 
Let’s take a closer look at inflation to see how this shakes out. 
Trump has famously imposed massive and ever-changing tariffs on virtually all of America’s trading partners  including, most recently, a 50 percent levy on many goods from Canada. 
If I run a liquor store and want to stock Canada’s iconic Crown Royal, each $25 bottle now costs me $37. 
I either eat that cost, drop the product…or pass some of the increase on to customers. 
Repeated across the economy, these little pass-throughs add up. 
The Dallas Federal Reserve calculated that, as of March, America’s core inflation rate would have been just 2.3 percent  instead of 3.2 percent  without Trump’s tariffs. 
Put another way, Yale’s Budget Lab estimates that tariffs cost the average US household $1,100 a year. 
So maybe the economy is doing okay…but it could also be better. 
Personally I’d like an extra $1,100. 
And a Canadian whisky, for that matter. 
One link for later 
 Don’t rent the new iPhone. 
Apple rolled out a new “upgrade” program a few days ago, partnering with Klarna to offer customers the ability to rent smartphones for $35 a month. 
The scheme may make sense for diehards who always want the latest phone and switch devices frequently. 
But for most other people, it’s not worth it. 
“How do I know people aren’t getting a good deal here?” 
one law professor said. 
“If they were, Apple wouldn’t be offering it.” 
Before you go… 
* Did you know…that stroke patients can sometimes relearn speech by singing their sentences first? 
The treatment is called melodic intonation therapy, and it grew out of research into how the brain processes music and language. 
* Today’s trivia: What kind of fruit is an ugli? 
(You can find this and other brain puzzles in Vox’s daily crossword. 
Look for the answer in tomorrow’s edition.) 
* Yesterday’s trivia: Yesterday we asked you for the name of Hercules’s stepmother. 
That would be Hera, who in Greek mythology  and contrary to her Disney movie portrayal  absolutely hated Hercules and repeatedly tried to kill him. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.6%Caitlin Dewey: 2.2%Vox: 4.2%Confirmation Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.3%Vox: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Caitlin Dewey: 3.3%Vox: 2.6%Availability Heuristic5.6%This article: 2.7%Caitlin Dewey: 0.9%Vox: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.7%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.5%Vox: 1.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 1.1%Vox: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Caitlin Dewey: 5.9%Vox: 5.4%Framing Effect10.6%This article: 4.4%Caitlin Dewey: 0.4%Vox: 0.4%Loss Aversion4.4%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.6%Vox: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Caitlin Dewey: 0.7%Vox: 1.9%Optimism Bias1.9%This article: 5.8%Caitlin Dewey: 1.3%Vox: 2.0%Pessimism Bias5.8%This article: 8.1%Caitlin Dewey: 5.6%Vox: 5.9%Negativity Bias8.1%This article: 2.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.7%Vox: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias2.0%This article: 2.7%Caitlin Dewey: 0.6%Vox: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.1%Vox: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.1%Vox: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.6%Vox: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 1.8%Vox: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Caitlin Dewey: 1.7%Vox: 1.1%Recency Bias2.7%This article: 4.7%Caitlin Dewey: 0.8%Vox: 0.3%Primacy Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.4%Vox: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.9%Caitlin Dewey: 2.2%Vox: 2.8%Appeal to Authority3.9%This article: 6.6%Caitlin Dewey: 1.7%Vox: 1.9%False Dilemma6.6%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.1%Vox: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.8%Caitlin Dewey: 5.3%Vox: 5.6%Hasty Generalization2.8%This article: 3.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.3%Vox: 0.2%Red Herring3.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.4%Vox: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 2.8%Vox: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 1.3%Caitlin Dewey: 0.3%Vox: 0.8%Begging the Question1.3%This article: 4.2%Caitlin Dewey: 1.5%Vox: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.2%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.1%Vox: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.5%Vox: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.4%Caitlin Dewey: 0.3%Vox: 0.4%Composition/Division1.4%This article: 2.3%Caitlin Dewey: 2.8%Vox: 2.0%Anecdotal2.3%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 2.1%Vox: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.1%Vox: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.1%Vox: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.9%Caitlin Dewey: 3.1%Vox: 1.5%Unattributed Quote3.9%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 1.3%Vox: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.8%Caitlin Dewey: 11.0%Vox: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice5.8%This article: 0.9%Caitlin Dewey: 2.7%Vox: 1.4%Indoctrination0.9%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 2.0%Vox: 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Caitlin Dewey: 0.2%Vox: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.4%This article: 1.3%Caitlin Dewey: 3.5%Vox: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.3%

639 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker4.1%attributed speech613writer words
Selected voice

Apple

0%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words100% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%Apple: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Apple: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%Apple: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Apple: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%Apple: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.