Urbandale wants a new police station. What will it cost to build? 8%

By Phillip Sitter7%

8/1/2026, 3:59:29 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 409 faulty-reasoning hits from 545 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 19.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (24,749 of 26,881 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the article peer group.

The City of Urbandale wants to build a new police headquarters. 
It hopes to give voters a chance to approve a bond to pay for it during November's general election. 
But first, the Urbandale City Council will consider on Monday, Aug. 3, whether to approve the ballot language for a $25 million bond referendum. 
Officials have said the existing station at 3740 86th St. does not have the capacity for current operations or the expected growth of the police force. 
While the projected expense for a new police station has increased since last year, voters would decide in November whether to approve bonds that would cover less than half the estimated cost. 
Here is a breakdown of how the city would pay for the $60 million station, planned for the southwest corner of 100th Street and Douglas Avenue, without increasing its property tax levy, according to City Council documents: 
* $10 million from city reserves and local option sales tax revenue 
* $25 million from revenue from the NW Market Center tax increment financing district  City Council will also vote Monday on amending the district's TIF agreement to allow this 
* $25 million from the bond referendum, to be repaid in 15 years or less 
In July 2025, the Urbandale City Council approved an agreement with a consultant, Sidekick Development LLC, to act as an owner's agent for the project  someone who can help a city manage designs, request proposals for architects and contractors, and coordinate during construction to stay on schedule and budget. 
At the time, the proposal was for a $50 million, more than 70,000-square-feet new police station. 
What would a new Urbandale police station have? 
The existing police station was built in 1982 for 26 officers serving 18,000 residents, but the department now has 62 officers serving almost 50,000 residents. 
"The building is now inadequate to meet the operational demands of a growing city and an expanded police department staff and operations," according to council documents. 
A previous space needs study indicated it would not be feasible to continue adding on to the building. 
The latest plan calls for about 95,000 square feet that would accommodate more space for training  including with firearms on a range  evidence storage, offices, locker rooms and secure parking. 
What used to be at the proposed Urbandale police station site? 
The 4-acre proposed site at the southwest corner of 100th Street and Douglas Avenue was previously home to Dynamite Marketing, Inc., according to county property records. 
The city considered the property blighted because of the poor condition of the land, and the council approved buying it for $2.5 million in May 2024. 
The Business Record reported in May 2020 that Dynamite Marketing had demolished and hauled away the materials from a metal-sided office building, warehouse, sheds, storage silos and underground concrete slabs. 
The Idaho-based food, vitamin and supplement company made some of its products in Urbandale but moved operations to Idaho and put the property up for sale after production became unprofitable. 
Phillip Sitter covers the suburbs for the Des Moines Register. 
Phillip can be reached via email at PSitter@usatodayco.com. 
Find out more about him online in the Register's staff directory. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.8%Phillip Sitter: 1.2%The Des Moines Register: 1.2%Confirmation Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Phillip Sitter: 5.4%The Des Moines Register: 2.4%Framing Effect9.0%This article: 5.9%Phillip Sitter: 1.5%The Des Moines Register: 1.1%Loss Aversion5.9%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Phillip Sitter: 0.8%The Des Moines Register: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 3.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Phillip Sitter: 1.2%The Des Moines Register: 1.6%Negativity Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.2%Phillip Sitter: 6.3%The Des Moines Register: 1.5%Appeal to Authority17.2%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 2.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.5%Phillip Sitter: 1.4%The Des Moines Register: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.5%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.5%Phillip Sitter: 1.4%The Des Moines Register: 1.8%Anecdotal5.5%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.5%Phillip Sitter: 2.4%The Des Moines Register: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.5%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.5%Phillip Sitter: 3.6%The Des Moines Register: 0.8%Unattributed Quote9.5%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phillip Sitter: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

545 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.