Forbes⁠65%

Director John Speraw Is Building USA Volleyball Heading Into LA28 ⁠16%

By Tim Genske⁠22%

8/3/2026, 5:21:17 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 1,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,328 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (22,455 of 26,531 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the article peer group.

Director John Speraw Is Building USA Volleyball Heading Into LA28 
USA Volleyball's Director of National Teams reflects on Olympic heartbreak, legendary UCLA coach Al Skates and the leadership philosophy shaping America's pursuit of gold at LA28. 
(This is part one of a two-part story is based on a Forbes exclusive interview with John Speraw on July 10, 2026. 
All quotes are taken directly from a transcript of the interview. 
Part two will be published Thursday August 6, 2026) 
As Los Angeles prepares to welcome the world for the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games, few leaders are more closely connected to Southern California's volleyball legacy than John Speraw. 
Raised in the West San Gabriel Valley before starring at UCLA, Speraw has spent more than three decades helping shape American volleyball—from NCAA championships to Olympic podiums. 
After leading the U.S. 
Men's National Team to bronze medals at the Rio 2016 and Paris 2024 Olympic Games, he now oversees all of USA Volleyball's national team programs as Director of National Teams, helping position the sport for what could become its defining moment when the Olympic spotlight returns to Los Angeles. 
In an exclusive interview with Forbes, Speraw spoke about the mentors who influenced and shaped his career, the culture that fueled Team USA's success, and the Olympic moments that still occupy his thoughts years later. 
Great Coaches Have Mentors 
Throughout the conversation, one name would surface repeatedly. 
Al Scates. 
For volleyball fans, Scates is synonymous with another UCLA coaching legend: John Wooden. 
Scates coached at UCLA for 50 years (1963-2012) and won 19 NCAA men’s volleyball championships. 
Yet Speraw believes the broader sports world still doesn’t fully appreciate Scates’ influence—not only on volleyball, but on generations of leaders who learned under him. 
"He's one of the great coaches in American sports history," Speraw said. 
"So many of us are still in this sport because of the positive influence he had on our lives." 
An Education Beyond Volleyball 
Speraw’s education at UCLA extended well beyond the volleyball court. 
He describes arriving in Westwood at a unique moment in Bruins history, where the philosophies of basketball icon John Wooden still resonated, while Scates would continue to build what became the winningest coaching résumé in UCLA athletics. 
"The Wooden influence was such a core philosophy of what we did at UCLA," Speraw explained. 
"Then there was Al Scates, the winningest coach in UCLA history. 
I had the opportunity to absorb from both of them." 
While Wooden became known worldwide for the Pyramid of Success, Speraw says Scates possessed a different genius—one built around relentless innovation. 
Long before analytics became fashionable across professional sports, Scates was charting every serve, attack and rotation by hand. 
Each evening after matches, assistants painstakingly recorded individual statistics before Scates spent hours calculating patterns himself. 
The process bordered on obsession. 
Speraw laughed while recalling the night he accidentally left one of those stat sheets in his backpack. 
At nearly three o'clock in the morning, his phone rang. 
Scates couldn't finish his nightly analysis because one page was missing. 
"I had to drive to a 24-hour Kinko's and fax it to him," Speraw recalled. 
"He literally couldn't go to sleep until he finished all the statistics." 
Today, every elite volleyball program relies on sophisticated analytics. 
Three decades ago, Scates was doing the same work with paper, pencils and determination. 
Sicily Changed Everything 
Ironically, coaching wasn't part of Speraw's original career plan. 
Unlike many future coaches, he wasn't drawing up lineups as a teenager or dreaming about standing on a sideline. 
After graduating from UCLA, he expected medicine—not volleyball—to define his future. 
He worked at UCLA Medical Center while considering medical school and preparing for the MCAT. 
Volleyball appeared to be ending. 
Instead, it quietly began again. 
When Doug Beal asked Scates to coach Team USA at the 1997 World University Games in Sicily, Skates invited his former player to become his assistant. 
That decision permanently altered Speraw's career. 
His first coaching assignment also came with an unexpected bonus. 
He shared a hotel room with one of the greatest coaches in American sports. 
There, spread across two beds inside a modest room in Sicily, Scates walked his young assistant through opponent tendencies, statistical matchups and strategic planning before matches. 
Looking back nearly three decades later, Speraw still speaks about that experience with visible gratitude. 
"I was getting one-on-one tutoring with one of the all-time greats in American sports history," he said. 
"It was incredible." 
For Speraw, Sicily wasn't merely a coaching assignment. 
It became his graduate school. 
Building Leaders, Not Just Teams 
Perhaps Skates' greatest legacy isn't measured by championships. 
It's measured by the people he developed. 
Speraw points toward an extraordinary coaching tree that includes Olympic legends, collegiate coaches and professional leaders who continue shaping the sport (and beyond) decades after wearing UCLA uniforms. 
He describes annual gatherings where former Bruins from multiple generations reunite around the coach who connected them. 
"It's like a fraternity," Speraw said. 
"We're all the same." 
The common characteristics are striking. 
Competitiveness. 
Curiosity. 
Humility. 
Humor. 
Speraw laughs when discussing another side of Scates rarely seen publicly. 
"Most people don't know he is absolutely hilarious," Speraw said. 
"He knew when it was time to compete, but he also knew when it was time to enjoy yourself. 
We all learned that balance." 
Those lessons would later become foundational as Speraw assumed one of the most demanding coaching jobs in international sport. 
Changing The Culture 
When Speraw became head coach of the U.S. 
Men's National Team, he inherited extraordinary talent. 
He also inherited strong personalities. 
Olympic veterans brought years of professional experience, strong opinions, and competitive drive. 
Managing that environment required more than technical expertise. 
It demanded emotional intelligence. 
"My initial focus was trying to build a much more cohesive team culture," Speraw explained. 
Rather than emphasizing tactics alone, Speraw concentrated on psychology. 
His program rested on two words: Tough and Together 
The philosophy became the emotional foundation of Team USA. 
How would players respond during Olympic pressure? 
How would they support one another after mistakes? 
Could collaboration become a competitive advantage? 
"I wanted to maximize our potential through collaboration," Speraw said. 
"The values we emphasized were tough and together." 
Over twelve years, that philosophy helped produce one of the most consistently successful eras in American men's volleyball. 
Yet the Olympic Games have a way of defining careers by the thinnest possible margins. 
The Medal That Wasn’t Enough 
Most Olympic coaches would celebrate two bronze medals. 
Speraw appreciates them. 
He also remembers what almost happened. 
Rio 2016. 
Paris 2024. 
Two Olympic semifinals. 
Two heartbreaking five-set defeats that denied Team USA an opportunity to play for gold. 
"My regrets are the semifinals," Speraw admitted. 
"We were there twice." 
Even now, he replays moments from those matches. 
A substitution. 
A serve. 
One decision. 
One point. 
Elite sport often compresses years of preparation into seconds. 
"The margins are close," he said. 
"That's why sport is great—and sometimes hard." 
What gives Speraw the greatest satisfaction, however, wasn't simply the medals. 
It was how his teams responded after devastating disappointment. 
Winning a bronze medal match immediately following an Olympic semifinal loss may be one of the most difficult emotional challenges in sports. 
Twice, his players found the resilience to regroup. 
Looking back, Speraw believes that achievement reflected something deeper than volleyball. 
It reflected culture. 
Leading USA Volleyball Into LA28 
As Los Angeles counts down to LA28, Speraw now finds himself leading American volleyball from an even broader perspective—not as one national team coach, but as the executive responsible for also expanding the sport's reach across the country. 
It is a challenge every bit as ambitious as preparing a team for the Olympics. 
It could become his most significant legacy. 
In Part Two: John Speraw discusses why the years leading into LA28 represent a once-in-a-generation opportunity as volleyball in America continues to surge through youth participation, commercial investment and the continued rise of women's sports. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.0%Tim Genske: 2.7%Forbes: 2.8%Confirmation Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Tim Genske: 1.0%Forbes: 2.6%Availability Heuristic1.4%This article: 3.3%Tim Genske: 0.8%Forbes: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.9%Forbes: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Tim Genske: 0.7%Forbes: 5.1%Framing Effect1.1%This article: 1.1%Tim Genske: 0.7%Forbes: 0.4%Loss Aversion1.1%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.5%Tim Genske: 0.1%Forbes: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.5%This article: 4.6%Tim Genske: 1.9%Forbes: 3.6%Optimism Bias4.6%This article: 0.7%Tim Genske: 0.2%Forbes: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.7%This article: 3.1%Tim Genske: 1.1%Forbes: 4.7%Negativity Bias3.1%This article: 1.4%Tim Genske: 0.7%Forbes: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias1.4%This article: 1.1%Tim Genske: 0.3%Forbes: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error1.1%This article: 2.0%Tim Genske: 0.5%Forbes: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias2.0%This article: 0.8%Tim Genske: 2.3%Forbes: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Tim Genske: 6.5%Forbes: 2.9%Halo Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.6%Tim Genske: 0.2%Forbes: 1.3%Recency Bias0.6%This article: 2.6%Tim Genske: 0.7%Forbes: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.0%Tim Genske: 1.5%Forbes: 4.0%Appeal to Authority6.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.7%Tim Genske: 0.2%Forbes: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.7%This article: 2.2%Tim Genske: 0.8%Forbes: 4.9%Hasty Generalization2.2%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.6%Tim Genske: 0.7%Forbes: 0.7%Bandwagon2.6%This article: 2.2%Tim Genske: 0.5%Forbes: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion2.2%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.9%Tim Genske: 1.8%Forbes: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.9%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.7%Tim Genske: 2.7%Forbes: 1.7%Anecdotal10.7%This article: 1.4%Tim Genske: 0.4%Forbes: 0.1%No True Scotsman1.4%This article: 0.4%Tim Genske: 0.1%Forbes: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.4%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.6%Tim Genske: 0.2%Forbes: 0.1%Middle Ground0.6%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.8%Tim Genske: 1.0%Forbes: 4.3%Biased Writer Voice3.8%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 2.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Genske: 0.0%Forbes: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Tim Genske: 0.7%Forbes: 4.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S
2.6%

1328 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker17%attributed speech1,101writer words
Selected voice

John Speraw

52%flagged-word coverage
227 attributed words100% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%John Speraw: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%John Speraw: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading

Loading

Loading

Loading


Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.