WPLN News34%

Knoxville will soon get a new Greyhound bus terminal after years without one 7%

By Daniel Potter34%

8/3/2026, 2:30:34 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 354 faulty-reasoning hits from 434 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of 7% (27,295 of 29,323 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the article peer group.

Greyhound Lines will soon move into a vacant building in North Knoxville, signaling a better bus experience with more amenities for riders after several years without a full terminal. 
The site is on Knoxville Center Drive, about 7 miles from downtown. 
The building was formerly a Wendy’s and later Don Chuy’s restaurant. 
Additional details about the new terminal, including possible new destinations, have not been released. 
“We’re in the early stages of preparing the new terminal, including permitting and site improvements,” a Greyhound spokesperson said. 
Currently, passengers are dropped off and picked up in front of a First Horizon Bank in East Knoxville. 
The closest available food, seating and bathrooms are at a Buddy’s Bar-B-Q next door. 
On a recent day, passengers like Jacob Steelman sat alongside a curb. 
“I think it’s kind of crazy being dropped off here,” he said. 
“This isn’t a very accessible location.” 
Councilmember Matthew DeBardelaben, who facilitated the lease in his professional role as a senior associate broker at Avison Young, said he hopes the new terminal will be an improvement. 
He called the new location a “transportation hub,” noting the Amazon Fulfillment Center located across the street, as well as Interstate 640 and a Knoxville Area Transit bus stop nearby. 
“We had to find a spot that met the zoning  and where the neighborhood and neighbors would be glad that the bus station is there,” he said. 
One of those neighbors includes OneLife Church’s east campus. 
Leaders of the church said they generally support a bus hub, but have concerns over the main road to the terminal. 
“It needs a lot of repairs and maintenance,” said Rodney Arnold, a pastor at the church. 
“There’s a lot of lighting needed in that development.” 
The road is privately owned by Blackrock, which also owns the land under the Amazon Fulfillment Center. 
Under the terms of the lease, DeBardelaben said Greyhound will pay a yearly fee to maintain the road. 
The new terminal is located along Knoxville Center Drive. 
(Jacqui Sieber / WUOT News) 
The new terminal is about a fifth of the size of the original, which closed in 2022. 
But a Greyhound spokesperson said it will “improve travel experience and support future service enhancements.” 
“Signing this lease reflects our long-term investment in the market,” the company said. 
The location of the new terminal has been owned by Oregon-based 88 Investment LLC since 2022, according to public records. 
Greyhound officials said they are hoping to open the new terminal in early 2027. 
Copyright © 2026 WUOT 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.0%Daniel Potter: 0.5%WPLN: 1.8%Confirmation Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.3%WPLN: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Daniel Potter: 1.7%WPLN: 2.8%Availability Heuristic3.2%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 1.1%WPLN: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 1.1%WPLN: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.2%WPLN: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Daniel Potter: 3.8%WPLN: 3.4%Framing Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.3%WPLN: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.1%Daniel Potter: 7.7%WPLN: 2.2%Optimism Bias14.1%This article: 3.7%Daniel Potter: 0.9%WPLN: 0.8%Pessimism Bias3.7%This article: 15.2%Daniel Potter: 2.2%WPLN: 5.7%Negativity Bias15.2%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 1.5%WPLN: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Daniel Potter: 0.2%WPLN: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error6.7%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 1.9%WPLN: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Daniel Potter: 2.9%WPLN: 1.6%Halo Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.8%WPLN: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 2.0%WPLN: 2.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.5%WPLN: 2.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.4%WPLN: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.4%WPLN: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 1.6%WPLN: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 3.5%Daniel Potter: 0.5%WPLN: 0.5%Begging the Question3.5%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 1.1%WPLN: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.2%WPLN: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.8%Daniel Potter: 0.8%WPLN: 1.8%Anecdotal2.8%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.5%Daniel Potter: 0.5%WPLN: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.5%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.8%Daniel Potter: 0.3%WPLN: 1.0%Unattributed Quote2.8%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 1.2%WPLN: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.7%Daniel Potter: 0.9%WPLN: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice6.7%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.3%WPLN: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Potter: 0.5%WPLN: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

434 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers48%attributed speech225writer words
Selected voice

Jacob Steelman

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words8.6% of attributed speech48% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Unattributed Quote+66.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jacob Steelman: 66.7%66.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.