NBC News58%

Rep. Andy Ogles loses his Republican primary in Tennessee 15%

By Ben Kamisar30%

8/6/2026, 7:04:10 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 418 faulty-reasoning hits from 389 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (26,188 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the article peer group.

Rep. 
Andy Ogles of Tennessee has lost his Republican primary, NBC News projects, falling to a former state official in a primary season that has seen an unusually high number of incumbents lose renomination. 
See live results 
Charlie Hatcher, the former state agricultural commissioner, rode support from prominent establishment Republicans to a victory over Ogles, a controversial congressman backed by President Donald Trump. 
He is a heavy favorite in the general election in the deep-red district. 
Ogles was outraised and outspent on the airwaves, largely because of a massive ad effort from a pro-clean energy group  a last-minute campaign Ogles criticized in an interview with Fox News. 
While Ogles had arguably the most important endorsement in a GOP primary in Trump’s, Hatcher had backing from Gov. 
Bill Lee, former Gov. 
Bill Haslam and other prominent Republicans, like former Trump Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue. 
Ogles has faced various controversies over the years. 
He said this year that Muslims don’t belong in American society, deleted a homophobic social media post after having blamed a staffer and argued last year that the federal government should revoke future New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s citizenship and deport him. 
He was also investigated on suspicion of campaign finance violations; he has not been charged with any crimes. 
Ogles told The Associated Press that the Justice Department returned his cellphone, which it had seized during the investigation. 
But while Ogles had fended off a well-funded primary opponent before, he couldn’t do it this time. 
Hatcher didn’t run away from Trump, either, despite Trump’s support for Ogles. 
Hatcher aligned himself with Trump and his policies and sought to contrast himself with Ogles. 
“Think what President Trump could do if our congressman spent less time talking and more time doing,” reads a quote on Hatcher’s website. 
Ogles is the ninth House member  six Democrats and three Republicans  to lose a primary this year. 
That’s the most in a nondecennial redistricting year since 1970, according to Vital Statistics on Congress. 
Two senators, Republicans Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and John Cornyn of Texas, also lost their primaries, and an additional House member  Rep. 
Tony Gonzales, R-Texas  finished second in his primary and then decided to drop out of the race and resign before a GOP runoff. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 1.8%NBC News: 1.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 1.7%NBC News: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.6%Ben Kamisar: 3.0%NBC News: 2.5%Availability Heuristic12.6%This article: 3.3%Ben Kamisar: 1.5%NBC News: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.3%This article: 4.4%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.6%Hindsight Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 1.1%NBC News: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Ben Kamisar: 9.4%NBC News: 5.5%Framing Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.2%Ben Kamisar: 0.3%NBC News: 0.3%Status Quo Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.6%NBC News: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 25.4%Ben Kamisar: 7.3%NBC News: 6.4%Negativity Bias25.4%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 1.0%NBC News: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 3.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.6%NBC News: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.8%NBC News: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.4%NBC News: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 16.7%Ben Kamisar: 0.5%NBC News: 0.8%Ad Hominem16.7%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.5%Ben Kamisar: 0.8%NBC News: 2.5%Appeal to Authority7.5%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 1.4%NBC News: 2.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 4.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 2.1%NBC News: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.4%NBC News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.9%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 1.4%Anecdotal4.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.9%Ben Kamisar: 2.6%NBC News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.9%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 1.7%Unattributed Quote5.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 1.0%NBC News: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.7%Ben Kamisar: 6.8%NBC News: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice6.7%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.6%NBC News: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 2.8%NBC News: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.6%NBC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Kamisar: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

389 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers12%attributed speech342writer words
Selected voice

Charlie Hatcher

100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words49% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Charlie Hatcher: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.6 ptsWriter: 7.6%Charlie Hatcher: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.