Breitbart90%

Trump: ‘Deal Is Imminent’ as Iran Talks Restart Monday on Denuclearization, Hormuz 62%

By Joshua Klein82%

8/2/2026, 10:41:16 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 842 faulty-reasoning hits from 784 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (10,144 of 26,447 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump said Sunday that a deal with Iran is “imminent” and negotiations will begin Monday afternoon over the Strait of Hormuz and Tehran’s nuclear program, one day after he called off what he described as a potentially massive U.S. attack on the Islamic Republic. 
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said the United States had been prepared to launch the attack Sunday before Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Iran urged him to hold off to allow diplomacy another chance. 
“We were all set to go, just about at this time right now, and it would have been a massive attack,” Trump said. 
“But when the allies asked to call it off, you got to sort of say, ‘Well, let’s see.’” 
“The reason they asked is they think there’s a deal,” he continued. 
“There’s a deal on Hormuz, and then there will be a deal on the nuclear, or you might call it the denuclearization of Iran. 
I call it the denuclearization of Iran.” 
Trump said negotiations with Tehran would begin Monday afternoon. 
“Now what we’re doing is we’re talking to them in the form of a negotiation,” he said. 
“It begins tomorrow afternoon, and we’ll see.” 
Trump later said, “the deal is imminent” regarding the Strait of Hormuz and, ultimately, Iran’s denuclearization, while acknowledging there were competing views over whether he should proceed with the attack. 
“The deal is imminent having to do with the Hormuz Strait and also ultimately, the denuclearization of Iran,” Trump said. 
Asked whether Iran faced a deadline for reaching an agreement, Trump said the United States remained prepared to strike but that he would prefer a diplomatic resolution. 
“We’re ready to go any time we want,” Trump said. 
“Would I rather make a deal? 
I’m not looking to kill people. 
Because people die. 
A lot of people die. 
We don’t want that.” 
Trump said Iran had “very strongly” asked the United States to hold off and acknowledged Tehran could publicly dispute his account. 
“They said, ‘We’d like to make a deal,’” Trump said. 
“Now, you know, I don’t know what they said, because a lot of times they’ll say that to me, and then they’ll go out and say, ‘We don’t know what he’s talking about.’ 
Obviously, they don’t want to be attacked.” 
Iranian state media on Sunday denied that Tehran had asked Trump to cancel the strikes, while Iranian officials disputed that an agreement had been reached to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. 
Trump’s decision came after Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman urged him to pursue diplomacy during a phone call Saturday. 
Trump said Sunday that he asked the crown prince directly whether he preferred a U.S. attack or an agreement. 
“I said, ‘What would you rather do? 
Would you rather have us do this or not?’” 
Trump recalled. 
“They said, ‘We would much prefer a deal as opposed to an attack, because you don’t know where these attacks lead.’” 
Trump said the planned operation would have been “by far the biggest attack since World War II” and “disastrous” for Iran. 
“They didn’t want us to do it,” he said. 
“And frankly, Saudi Arabia didn’t want it either. 
They thought that a deal is imminent.” 
The remarks came after Trump announced Saturday night that he had canceled the attack after saying the “perimeters” of a deal had been reached to immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end Iran’s nuclear threat. 
Trump said at the time that Israel had joined the United States in agreeing to hold off. 
Diplomatic efforts over Hormuz appeared to continue Sunday. 
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said negotiations with Oman over the strategic waterway had entered their “final stages,” according to Iranian state media. 
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei, however, said the talks with Oman did not mean Tehran had agreed to reopen the strait, insisting it would “under no circumstances” return to the arrangement that existed before the war began February 28. 
A regional official involved in the mediation efforts told the Associated Press (AP) that the latest proposal would return Washington and Tehran to negotiations over reopening Hormuz and halting attacks across the region. 
In exchange, the United States would end its naval blockade of Iran and allow Tehran to resume oil exports under the terms of the earlier ceasefire framework, according to the official. 
No final agreement has yet been reached, however, leaving Monday’s negotiations to determine whether Trump’s latest pause in military action produces the breakthrough he said is now “imminent.” 
Joshua Klein is a reporter for Breitbart News. 
Email him at jklein@breitbart.com. 
Follow him on Twitter @JoshuaKlein 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.4%Joshua Klein: 4.6%Breitbart: 4.3%Confirmation Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.9%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Joshua Klein: 2.5%Breitbart: 3.7%Availability Heuristic0.9%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.1%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Joshua Klein: 5.7%Breitbart: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias7.8%This article: 8.0%Joshua Klein: 7.5%Breitbart: 10.8%Framing Effect8.0%This article: 0.8%Joshua Klein: 1.4%Breitbart: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.8%This article: 8.5%Joshua Klein: 1.0%Breitbart: 0.6%Status Quo Bias8.5%This article: 4.6%Joshua Klein: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect4.6%This article: 9.9%Joshua Klein: 1.9%Breitbart: 3.1%Optimism Bias9.9%This article: 3.6%Joshua Klein: 1.9%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias3.6%This article: 4.0%Joshua Klein: 12.1%Breitbart: 9.5%Negativity Bias4.0%This article: 6.9%Joshua Klein: 1.6%Breitbart: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias6.9%This article: 2.7%Joshua Klein: 1.0%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Joshua Klein: 0.7%Breitbart: 3.8%In-Group Bias1.0%This article: 0.9%Joshua Klein: 0.3%Breitbart: 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.2%Breitbart: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Joshua Klein: 2.5%Breitbart: 1.7%Recency Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 1.4%Breitbart: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.4%Breitbart: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.8%Joshua Klein: 1.0%Breitbart: 3.8%Appeal to Authority4.8%This article: 7.0%Joshua Klein: 4.0%Breitbart: 2.4%False Dilemma7.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 1.9%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.5%Joshua Klein: 3.6%Breitbart: 7.2%Hasty Generalization1.5%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.8%Breitbart: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.3%Joshua Klein: 8.1%Breitbart: 8.4%Appeal to Emotion2.3%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 1.2%Breitbart: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 1.9%Breitbart: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 1.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 1.4%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.4%Breitbart: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.9%Joshua Klein: 2.5%Breitbart: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.9%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.1%Joshua Klein: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.2%Special Pleading5.1%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.8%Joshua Klein: 2.2%Breitbart: 2.6%Unattributed Quote7.8%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 1.3%Breitbart: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 1.9%Breitbart: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.1%Breitbart: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joshua Klein: 0.6%Breitbart: 6.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Joshua Klein: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.2%

784 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers72%attributed speech216writer words
Selected voice

Esmaeil Baqaei

100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words7.0% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.9 ptsWriter: 7.9%Esmaeil Baqaei: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.