Trump to headline Great American State Fair after music acts cancel ⁠58%

By Natalie Allison⁠87%

5/30/2026, 11:31:32 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 93.4% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 262 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,954 of 30,584 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump will headline an opening ceremony for the Great American State Fair on the National Mall next month after many of the musical performers slated for the event canceled, citing the event’s associations with him. 
President Donald Trump on Saturday said he was “ordering my Representatives to look at the feasibility of doing an AMERICA IS BACK Rally.” 
(Aaron Schwartz/Pool/For The Washington Post) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 3.4%The Washington Post: 3.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.7%The Washington Post: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 3.4%The Washington Post: 4.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 1.3%The Washington Post: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.4%The Washington Post: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 2.4%The Washington Post: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 93.4%Natalie Allison: 14.1%The Washington Post: 21.4%Framing Effect93.4%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.2%The Washington Post: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.6%The Washington Post: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.0%The Washington Post: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 3.1%The Washington Post: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 3.3%The Washington Post: 3.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 48.7%Natalie Allison: 12.1%The Washington Post: 18.5%Negativity Bias48.7%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 3.0%The Washington Post: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 1.3%The Washington Post: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.3%The Washington Post: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 30.3%Natalie Allison: 1.9%The Washington Post: 2.1%In-Group Bias30.3%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.7%The Washington Post: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 2.6%The Washington Post: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 1.2%The Washington Post: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.0%The Washington Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 1.4%The Washington Post: 2.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.6%The Washington Post: 1.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.0%The Washington Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.6%The Washington Post: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.6%The Washington Post: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 3.4%The Washington Post: 5.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 1.0%The Washington Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 2.3%The Washington Post: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.6%The Washington Post: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 4.0%The Washington Post: 5.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.0%The Washington Post: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.4%The Washington Post: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 5.2%The Washington Post: 6.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 1.6%The Washington Post: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 63.2%Natalie Allison: 0.4%The Washington Post: 4.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)63.2%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.4%The Washington Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.8%The Washington Post: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.0%The Washington Post: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.0%The Washington Post: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 1.2%The Washington Post: 1.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.0%The Washington Post: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 48.7%Natalie Allison: 2.3%The Washington Post: 2.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)48.7%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.0%The Washington Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.1%The Washington Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.0%The Washington Post: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.2%The Washington Post: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.0%The Washington Post: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 30.3%Natalie Allison: 3.4%The Washington Post: 4.7%Unattributed Quote30.3%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 2.9%The Washington Post: 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 30.3%Natalie Allison: 8.1%The Washington Post: 15.1%Biased Writer Voice30.3%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 1.0%The Washington Post: 2.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 1.6%The Washington Post: 3.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 2.8%The Washington Post: 1.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natalie Allison: 0.0%The Washington Post: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

76 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker30%attributed speech53writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words100% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%President Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%President Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.