Wonkette93%

Wonkette Movie Night: Dark Passage 20%

By ziggywiggy21%

8/1/2026, 5:00:21 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 499 faulty-reasoning hits from 489 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (23,970 of 29,795 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the article peer group.

Dark Passage starts from the point of view of a man who has just escaped prison. 
This first-person POV allows you to feel empathy for the character; it also transfers his distrust and his desperation as he encounters different people and worries about being caught onto the viewer, pulling you into the film. 
Vincent Parry was convicted of murdering his wife but he claims to be an innocent man. 
As he tries to hide from the police and people who may recognize him, he meets a woman who believes in his innocence. 
She brings him to her apartment where he discovers why this woman of affluence would risk everything to help him. 
She believed her own father had been wrongly convicted of murdering her stepmother. 
She also believed the same thing had happened to Vincent and closely followed his trial. 
He wants to find the real killer of his wife and she wants to help him. 
But something is stopping him  his very recognizable face. 
A sketchy plastic surgery says he can help, for $200 Vincent is going to look like a new man. 
Healing from the surgery with a bandaged face and unable to speak he spends his time with Irene who cares for him and protects him while he heals. 
Soon the puzzle pieces start to fall into place. 
Vincent begins to understand who the real killer is while people continue to die around him. 
And Vincent and Irene’s time together turns into love. 
Can Vincent prove he is not guilty while still protecting the woman he has fallen for? 
Who wouldn’t fall in love with this woman? 
In real life they did fall in love. 
Bogart and Bacall were married at the Malabar Farm in Ohio, home to his friend the writer Louis Bromfield, in 1945. 
Bacall was 19 and Bogart was 44; they had two children and remained married till his death in 1957. 
They made four films together, To Have And Have Not (1944), The Big Sleep (1946), Dark Passage (1947), and Key Largo (1948). 
You can find photos from the original San Francisco filming locations used in Dark Passage here . 
Dark Passage stars Humphrey Bogart, Lauren Bacall, Agnes Moorehead, Bruce Bennett, Clifton Young, Douglas Kennedy, Rory Mallinson, Tom D’Andrea, and Houseley Stevenson. 
Directed by Delmer Daves. 
Dark Passage is available for free with ads on Tubi and Plex; $3.99 in the usual places. 
Free on OKRU . 
To make requests and see the movie lists and schedules, go to WonkMovie . 
The animated short is Black and White by Jesús Pérez and Gerd Gockell. 
Next week’s movie night selection is Arsenic And Old Lace , available for free on the Internet Archive . 
$5.99 in the usual places. 
A colorized version is available for free on Alugha . 
The button below will take any amount of your choosing at PayPal or we have a Patreon too. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.7%ziggywiggy: 3.8%Wonkette: 5.3%Confirmation Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%ziggywiggy: 0.4%Wonkette: 2.0%Availability Heuristic1.6%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.3%ziggywiggy: 0.8%Wonkette: 0.6%Hindsight Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%ziggywiggy: 2.7%Wonkette: 3.6%Framing Effect10.8%This article: 3.7%ziggywiggy: 0.9%Wonkette: 0.4%Loss Aversion3.7%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 15.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 2.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 2.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%ziggywiggy: 3.6%Wonkette: 0.7%Halo Effect11.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%ziggywiggy: 1.1%Wonkette: 0.4%Primacy Effect4.5%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 13.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 2.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.3%ziggywiggy: 1.3%Wonkette: 1.4%Appeal to Authority5.3%This article: 5.3%ziggywiggy: 1.3%Wonkette: 1.4%False Dilemma5.3%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 8.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.6%ziggywiggy: 0.4%Wonkette: 0.5%Bandwagon1.6%This article: 14.9%ziggywiggy: 7.3%Wonkette: 6.8%Appeal to Emotion14.9%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 1.6%ziggywiggy: 0.4%Wonkette: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.6%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.3%ziggywiggy: 0.8%Wonkette: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.3%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 2.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 9.2%ziggywiggy: 7.5%Wonkette: 30.2%Biased Writer Voice9.2%This article: 3.3%ziggywiggy: 0.8%Wonkette: 2.2%Indoctrination3.3%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 9.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ziggywiggy: 0.0%Wonkette: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 17.8%ziggywiggy: 9.1%Wonkette: 3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…17.8%

489 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.