Phoenix reacts to The Rhythm Room’s impending closure 53%

By Benjamin Leatherman50%

8/3/2026, 11:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 711 faulty-reasoning hits from 506 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.9% and a BS Rank of 53% (12,476 of 26,304 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the article peer group.

The news hit local concertgoers and members of Phoenix’s music scene out of the blue. 
Last week, The Rhythm Room’s longtime owner Bob Corritore announced he will be closing he will close the iconic Phoenix club at the end of May 2027. 
The longtime bluesman and harmonica player, who’s turning 70 in September, says he’s ready for “the next chapter” of his life after more than 35 years in business. 
The announcement struck a chord. 
The Rhythm Room’s regulars and local music fans were shocked and saddened by the news and flooded social media with their memories of the blues club and music venue. 
Some couldn’t believe the club would be gone after more than three decades. 
Others lamented the fact that another beloved piece of Phoenix music history was disappearing. 
Mostly, they shared memories of The Rhythm Room, including their favorite shows and best memories of the place. 
Here’s what Valley music fans had to say about The Rhythm Room’s impending closure. 
Saw Leon Russell and his daughter there along with Jesse Colin Young to my right and Glen Campbell seated inches in front of me. 
Goodbye old friend and thanks for the memories 
Robert on Facebook 
No, say it isn’t so! 
I’ve seen so many legends here. 
Colleen on Facebook 
AZ has lost so many great old venues over the years. 
marie.margaret17 on Instagram 
The last of the killer independents! 
Went there for years and loved every minute of it. 
Legends played there and still do. 
Bob was a gracious steward and deserves his place in Phoenix music history. 
My dream of winning the lottery and buying the place never materialized but it was fun for a while. 
doubleskidmarks on Instagram 
Very sad to read this. 
Hope someone takes up the mantle and keeps the place, and live music alive. 
Sharon on Facebook 
I saw Sistah Blue there so many times…what a great venue for live music! 
Jennifer on Facebook 
Some of the best of the best have played there. 
Hope someone saves it. 
Bo on Facebook 
My wife and I saw Leon Redbone perform there a few years back. 
Great show!! 
James on Facebook 
Sad to hear, but thanks for the ride. 
Many great moments in that place. 
The people who love great music appreciate you and all that you have done here in the valley. 
Adam on Facebook 
Another independent venue dying in the age of LiveNation. 
First venue I saw Sturgill Simpson at in 2014 
Phunguy on Instagram 
Bob is a local legend and while I’m saddened to hear that our beloved gem, @rhythmroom will be closing, I’m very happy that Bob will get to retire and enjoy some chill time and new adventures. 
It’s anyone’s guess if Bob would like to sunset RR as his swan song or if it’s even going to be an option as a sale. 
Jhenifershipe on Instagram 
This ruined the summer, love rhythm room! 
I’ve seen so many young bands and legacy acts too! 
juantanamobay on Instagram 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.3%Phoenix New Times: 0.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Benjamin Leatherman: 2.9%Phoenix New Times: 1.8%Availability Heuristic10.7%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.7%Phoenix New Times: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias5.1%This article: 4.3%Benjamin Leatherman: 1.1%Phoenix New Times: 3.2%Framing Effect4.3%This article: 12.1%Benjamin Leatherman: 2.2%Phoenix New Times: 0.3%Loss Aversion12.1%This article: 3.8%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.5%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 3.8%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.5%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect3.8%This article: 16.2%Benjamin Leatherman: 3.2%Phoenix New Times: 1.5%Optimism Bias16.2%This article: 2.6%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.4%Phoenix New Times: 0.7%Pessimism Bias2.6%This article: 13.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 5.2%Phoenix New Times: 4.8%Negativity Bias13.0%This article: 7.1%Benjamin Leatherman: 1.0%Phoenix New Times: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.5%Phoenix New Times: 0.6%In-Group Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Benjamin Leatherman: 11.2%Phoenix New Times: 1.4%Halo Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.5%Phoenix New Times: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.4%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Primacy Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.7%Phoenix New Times: 1.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.1%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.7%Phoenix New Times: 0.7%False Dilemma5.1%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.3%Benjamin Leatherman: 1.8%Phoenix New Times: 3.0%Hasty Generalization5.3%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.9%Benjamin Leatherman: 1.5%Phoenix New Times: 2.0%Appeal to Emotion4.9%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 1.8%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.5%Phoenix New Times: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.8%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.6%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.5%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Composition/Division3.6%This article: 21.5%Benjamin Leatherman: 3.9%Phoenix New Times: 1.9%Anecdotal21.5%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.2%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.2%Phoenix New Times: 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.2%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.7%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.7%Phoenix New Times: 0.7%Unattributed Quote4.7%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 8.1%Phoenix New Times: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 3.3%Phoenix New Times: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice1.0%This article: 3.6%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.5%Phoenix New Times: 1.0%Indoctrination3.6%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 1.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Benjamin Leatherman: 1.7%Phoenix New Times: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

506 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.