Alice Fisher Obituary - Oswego, IL (1937-2026) ⁠12%

By Chicago Tribune⁠15%

8/3/2026, 10:05:00 PM

Topics: Obituary

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 7 hits. Analysis detected 21 faulty-reasoning hits from 98 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 21.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (26,669 of 30,190 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the article peer group.

Alice Fisher, passed away at home in the presence of her loved ones, leaving behind a legacy of compassion, service and quiet strength. 
Visitation will be held on Thursday, August 6, 2026 from 4-7 p.m. at The Healy Chapel, 332 W. 
Downer Place, Aurora, IL 60506. 
Her funeral service will be held on Friday, August 7, 2026 at 11 a.m. also at The Healy Chapel. 
Interment will be at Mt. 
Olivet Cemetery. 
For further information please call 630-897-9291 or visit www.healychapel.com to view her full obituary and/or leave an online condolence. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.4%Chicago Tribune: 1.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.8%Chicago Tribune: 2.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.0%Chicago Tribune: 3.7%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.1%Chicago Tribune: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Chicago Tribune: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.1%Chicago Tribune: 4.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Chicago Tribune: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Chicago Tribune: 13.8%Chicago Tribune: 5.5%Halo Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Chicago Tribune: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.5%Chicago Tribune: 1.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.4%Chicago Tribune: 2.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.1%Chicago Tribune: 5.5%Chicago Tribune: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion7.1%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Chicago Tribune: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Chicago Tribune: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.4%Chicago Tribune: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.5%Chicago Tribune: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.1%Chicago Tribune: 9.9%Chicago Tribune: 5.7%Biased Writer Voice7.1%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.4%Chicago Tribune: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.9%Chicago Tribune: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

98 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.