NH Chief Justice takes sudden medical leave of absence 10%

By Todd Bookman24%

7/31/2026, 7:28:50 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 91 faulty-reasoning hits from 180 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 19.7% and a BS Rank of 10% (27,547 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the article peer group.

New Hampshire Supreme Court Chief Justice Gordon MacDonald is taking a medical leave of absence effective immediately, court officials announced on Friday. 
The court provided no reason for MacDonald’s leave, or an estimate of how long he may be away from the bench. 
“The members of the New Hampshire Supreme Court are united in wishing Chief Justice MacDonald a full and speedy recovery,” the court’s four other justices said in a joint statement. 
The New Hampshire Supreme Court does not have any oral arguments scheduled until September 22. 
MacDonald was named to the bench in 2021 by former Gov. 
Chris Sununu, after serving as the state’s attorney general for four years. 
Prior to his work in state government, MacDonald was in private practice. 
He grew up in the Hanover area and attended Dartmouth College, before receiving a law degree at Cornell. 
As chief justice, MacDonald is one of five members of the court who hears cases and issues opinions, but he also has additional responsibilities overseeing a sprawling state court system. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 1.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 3.5%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 1.4%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.7%Todd Bookman: 3.3%New Hampshire Public Radio: 3.8%Framing Effect16.7%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.5%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 10.1%New Hampshire Public Radio: 3.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 1.6%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.7%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 16.7%Todd Bookman: 0.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%Halo Effect16.7%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.0%Todd Bookman: 0.3%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Recency Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 3.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 1.1%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 2.3%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 2.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.9%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.2%Todd Bookman: 0.6%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.3%Unattributed Quote12.2%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 1.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

180 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker17%attributed speech150writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words100% of attributed speech41% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-14.7 ptsWriter: 14.7%New Hampshire Supreme Court: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.