Leader of neo-Nazi group to pay fine, perform community service after targeting Concord café 26%

By Todd Bookman24%

7/30/2026, 2:20:50 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 192 hits. Analysis detected 801 faulty-reasoning hits from 714 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (22,483 of 30,213 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the article peer group.

More than three years after members of a neo-Nazi group disrupted a drag story hour at a cafe in downtown Concord, the New Hampshire Attorney General’s office announced Thursday it has reached a settlement with the group’s leader that includes fines and community service. 
Under the terms of the consent decree, Christopher Hood, the founder of NSC-131, will pay $2,500 and perform 250 hours of community service after admitting he violated the state’s antidiscrimination laws. 
Attorney General John Formella said the resolution of the case, despite repeated delays due to the group’s unwillingness to comply with court orders, was evidence of the state’s commitment to pursuing the group’s “abhorrent and disgraceful” actions. 
“Groups like NSC-131 are not welcome in this state, and that's what this resolution is intended to say,” Formella said during a press conference. 
In June 2023, around two dozen members of NSC-131 swarmed the Teatotaller cafe, a privately owned business that had invited a drag performer to read children’s stories. 
Video of the incident showed masked members of the group chanting and using Nazi salutes outside of the cafe, while at least one member of the group was seen banging on the shop’s windows. 
Concord police did not initially make any arrests, but six months later, the attorney general’s office filed civil complaints against Hood, the group’s leader, as well as nineteen “John Does” who allegedly orchestrated the protest. 
The group’s members were accused by the attorney general’s Civil Rights Unit of violating the state’s anti-discrimination laws, and were facing fines of up to $10,000. 
The case has been delayed, prosecutors said, by the group’s unwillingness to comply with court orders including to turn over evidence such as videos taken by members of NSC-131. 
A trial scheduled for this spring was postponed. 
This week, the parties entered into a consent decree that will require Hood to perform community service at a location approved by the attorney general’s office. 
Under the decree, the other group members, who were never identified, are also subject to the decree. 
Formella said Hood, through his attorney, told prosecutors that he had no intention of continuing his role with NSC-131, and that the group was now “essentially defunct” in New Hampshire. 
Hood’s attorney did not respond to a request for comment. 
NSC-131, or the Nationalist Social Club, is described by the Anti-Defamation League as a New England-based neo-Nazi group founded in 2019 that “espouses racism, antisemitism and intolerance” and whose “membership is a collection of neo-Nazis and racist skinheads, many of whom have previous membership in other white supremacist groups.” 
Members of NSC-131 have appeared sporadically around New England, displaying racist banners, chanting, and attempting to disrupt drag events. 
The group often filmed its activities and then posted videos on social media, though its social media presence appears to have waned in recent years. 
In 2022, members of the group staged a protest in Portsmouth, hanging a banner across a busy road emblazoned with the phrase “Keep New England White.” 
State prosecutors attempted to charge the group with trespassing and violations of the civil rights law, but a judge dismissed the criminal case as an attempt to stifle free speech protections. 
In Massachusetts, the Attorney General’s office also sought civil penalties against the group’s leaders in 2023 over its alleged targeting of migrant families and LGBTQ residents. 
Formella defended the consent decree, saying that it was important to have Hood admit he violated the law, even if he wouldn’t pay the maximum penalty of $10,000. 
He also called for lawmakers to increase potential financial penalties for future violations. 
“Even when we can't take legal action, even when the First Amendment may protect this activity from enforcement action, we as public officials can condemn these types of activities, and we can say they're not welcome here,” said Formella. 
Last summer, members of a different hate group, Blood Tribe, staged a protest in downtown Concord and on the lawn of the State House. 
The group waved flags bearing swasticas and held a banner reading “Trump Loves Epstein” before fleeing in the back of a U-Haul truck. 
The Attorney General’s office said the group’s conduct was protected speech, and no arrests or civil penalties were issued. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.1%Todd Bookman: 1.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.9%Confirmation Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.4%Todd Bookman: 3.5%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.4%Availability Heuristic14.4%This article: 6.9%Todd Bookman: 1.4%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic6.9%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Todd Bookman: 3.3%New Hampshire Public Radio: 3.6%Framing Effect10.2%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.7%Todd Bookman: 0.5%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.4%Status Quo Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 26.9%Todd Bookman: 10.1%New Hampshire Public Radio: 3.8%Negativity Bias26.9%This article: 4.2%Todd Bookman: 1.6%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias4.2%This article: 4.1%Todd Bookman: 0.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error4.1%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Todd Bookman: 0.7%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.3%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.9%Todd Bookman: 3.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.9%Appeal to Authority6.9%This article: 5.5%Todd Bookman: 1.1%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.1%False Dilemma5.5%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.9%Todd Bookman: 2.3%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.5%Hasty Generalization4.9%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 2.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.3%Todd Bookman: 0.9%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.3%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.6%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 8.8%Todd Bookman: 1.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%Indoctrination8.8%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Todd Bookman: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

714 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers27%attributed speech524writer words
Selected voice

John Formella

92%flagged-word coverage
171 attributed words90% of attributed speech63% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Indoctrination+36.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%John Formella: 36.8%36.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.