The Blaze86%

Video: Creep chases child at gas station, then mom threatens thug with the only weapon she has 27%

By Dave Urbanski44%

8/1/2026, 5:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 234 faulty-reasoning hits from 356 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (19,415 of 26,303 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the article peer group.

Surveillance video from a Georgia gas station captured a scary scene late last month  a male chasing a child around a car while the child's mother was pumping gas. 
It all played out after midnight at a Shell station on Delk Road in Marietta, WSB-TV reported . 
'The million-dollar question everyone watching is going to ask: Why did this happen? 
Why did this occur? 
And we don’t know those answers.' 
Video shows a shoeless, shirtless male approaching the car, the station said. 
While he eventually walks away, the male returns to the car, WSB said. 
The male this time walks closer to the mother but notices a child jumping to the driver's seat and exiting the car, the station said. 
The video then shows the male chasing the child. 
At one point, the male is seen opening the car's back door where the mother's other child was seated, WSB said. 
The mother then holds up the gas pump nozzle and gestures toward the male as he backs away, which gives her child time to get back into the car, the station said, adding that two witnesses appear in the frame and help. 
“The actions of the mother and everyone on the scene, their ability to remain calm under pressure and ... get him away from the children, get a hold of us so that we can get to the area allowed us to hold this individual accountable,” Public Information Officer Charles McPhilamy of the Marietta Police Department told WSB. 
The suspect, Jerahn Tucker, was arrested on three charges, including attempted kidnapping, the station said. 
Police told the station they found a THC vape in Tucker's car when they caught up to him. 
The gas station manager added to WSB that he’s kicked Tucker off the property multiple times. 
“The million-dollar question everyone watching is going to ask: Why did this happen? 
Why did this occur? 
And we don’t know those answers,” McPhilamy added to the station. 
Jail records Blaze News reviewed Friday indicate Tucker was still behind bars. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.5%Blaze Media: 5.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 4.0%Blaze Media: 2.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.7%Blaze Media: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.2%Dave Urbanski: 4.6%Blaze Media: 8.8%Framing Effect13.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 1.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.8%Blaze Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.2%Dave Urbanski: 9.4%Blaze Media: 9.2%Negativity Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.7%Blaze Media: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.3%Blaze Media: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.4%Blaze Media: 2.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.7%Blaze Media: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.8%Blaze Media: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.5%Blaze Media: 2.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 3.0%Blaze Media: 3.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.4%Blaze Media: 2.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.2%Blaze Media: 7.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.2%Dave Urbanski: 3.8%Blaze Media: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion13.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.4%Blaze Media: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 2.1%Blaze Media: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.7%Blaze Media: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.5%Dave Urbanski: 3.6%Blaze Media: 2.6%Unattributed Quote6.5%This article: 6.5%Dave Urbanski: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection6.5%This article: 13.2%Dave Urbanski: 4.7%Blaze Media: 9.4%Biased Writer Voice13.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.7%Blaze Media: 4.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 6.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 2.2%Blaze Media: 2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

356 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers80%attributed speech72writer words
Selected voice

Charles McPhilamy

21%flagged-word coverage
108 attributed words38% of attributed speech65% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Biased Writer Voice-65.3 ptsWriter: 65.3%Charles McPhilamy: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+21.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Charles McPhilamy: 21.3%21.3%Quote-first Misdirection+21.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Charles McPhilamy: 21.3%21.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.