Trump expands a voluntary pledge to protect consumers from high utility bills from AI data centers 46%

By Josh Boak53% Matthew Daly28% The Associated Press73%

7/24/2026, 6:26:54 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 207 hits. Analysis detected 1,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,048 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (16,585 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump is having governors and electricity companies join a pledge aimed at shielding U.S. consumers from higher utility bills from data centers  a sign of how the artificial intelligence build-out has become a lightning rod of controversy before the midterm elections. 
The president first announced the pledge with leading AI and tech companies in March, but that initial commitment has done little to comfort voters who are already grappling with affordability issues as they worry about competing for electricity, water and land with tech companies controlled by billionaires. 
It's unclear, with electricity demand already growing, whether consumers would see genuine savings. 
Trump is doubling down on the pledge at a time when the broader social contract is being rewritten by AI, a technology that is evolving so quickly in its capabilities that governments are struggling over how to provide oversight. 
The president, in remarks about the pledge at the Environmental Protection Agency, called on the gathered executives and governors to sell the public on data centers, stressing that the cities and towns that do have them will be “rich.” 
“You have to convince your community,” Trump said. 
“You can’t fight it. 
You have to go with it.” 
The president added: “If you don’t take all that money, somebody else is going to take it. 
You might as well do it yourselves.” 
Concerns about data centers cross party lines 
The president promised that electricity prices would drop because of the nonbinding pledge, saying there would be a surplus of power. 
It's not clear that data centers generating their own electricity will be sufficient to overcome the rising demand for electricity, but that did not deter Trump from saying that utility bills  a major concern for voters  will be lower. 
“Electricity bills for American families will actually come down," Trump said. 
“They’re going to have a lot of electricity left over, and they’ll put that into the grid.” 
The White House said Thursday the pledge has been signed by 23 governors and at least 187 companies, including 55 utilities and 27 data center developers. 
Signers include some of the nation’s biggest utilities such as NextEra Energy, Duke Energy, American Electric Power, Southern Co. and Pacific Gas & Electric. 
Data center developers that have signed the pledge include Equinix, Digital Realty and Prologis. 
A slowdown in data center construction could derail what has been one of the dominant drivers of U.S. economic growth, in addition to possibly ceding the U.S. edge in cultivating the technology to China and create national security risks. 
But AI's increasing ability to perform basic tasks  such as driving, analyzing spreadsheets and writing software  also potentially threatens millions of jobs. 
That has created mounting public resistance as tech companies concentrate historic levels of wealth in the hands of a select group of tycoons. 
The increased electricity demand could cause monthly utility bills to rise by 15% to 40% by 2030, according to a recent analysis by ICF, a consulting and technology services company. 
Opposition to data centers has spiraled into a bipartisan issue. 
Voters are worried about the environmental impact, use of AI in schools and the prospect of data centers making their communities more expensive and less livable. 
Data center companies say their facilities help to generate tax revenues for school districts and reduce property tax burdens for homeowners. 
The opposition has spread into the Republican stronghold of rural Texas and led to frustration with Gov. 
Greg Abbott, who is now among the 23 Republican governors who signed Trump’s nonbinding pledge. 
Gina Hinojosa, the Democratic nominee for Texas governor, has been using the issue to challenge Abbott before the November election. 
“They are owned by the richest men in the world,” she said of data centers. 
“We’re all footing the bill. 
There are no rules. 
It is the Wild West of data centers.” 
New York Gov. 
Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, signed an order to ban construction of large server warehouses in her state for a year. 
In May, Florida Gov. 
Ron DeSantis, a Republican, signed a law that he said would prevent utilities from passing along energy costs from data centers to residential and small-business customers. 
Already, dozens of state legislatures or utility commissions have moved to put in place requirements that data centers pay the cost of their electricity, including new power plants or transmission system upgrades. 
But it's not 
Tech companies are pushing growth of data centers 
In California, however, the industry opposes legislation designed to protect consumers from electricity price increases attributable to data centers, said Matthew Freedman, a staff attorney for the Utility Reform Network. 
“It is disappointing, but perhaps not surprising, that the same tech companies signing the Ratepayer Protection Pledge are simultaneously opposing efforts at the state level to force them to deliver on their promises,” Freedman said. 
In an interview with The Associated Press last month, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, whose computer chips are enabling the AI revolution, said America’s weakness is a lack of power generation for further developing the technology. 
Google, Microsoft, Meta, Oracle, xAI, OpenAI and Amazon are among the companies that have already committed to the Trump administration’s “Ratepayer Protection Pledge” that consumers will not shoulder the cost of the data center build-out. 
Despite the pledge, there are challenges on addressing issues with electricity prices. 
The White House has complained that PJM Interconnection, which oversees electric power in 13 states from Virginia to Illinois, can’t ensure adequate electricity supplies at reasonable prices in the AI-driven boom. 
White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said Thursday that PJM —- the nation’s largest grid operator  has failed to implement a bipartisan statement of principles signed by the Trump administration and all 13 governors in the region. 
“The Trump administration strongly advises PJM and its member companies to proactively reform its stakeholder process, reform its board governance, and implement the Statement of Principles before it is too late,” Rogers said. 
There are efforts to formalize Trump's pledge as law, with the House Energy and Commerce Committee approving a bipartisan bill. 
The bill would require data centers to bear the costs of grid upgrades. 
__ 
*Associated Press writer Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.3%Josh Boak: 1.6%NBC4 Washington: 2.3%Confirmation Bias3.3%This article: 3.7%Josh Boak: 0.7%NBC4 Washington: 0.4%Anchoring Bias3.7%This article: 2.3%Josh Boak: 1.9%NBC4 Washington: 1.7%Availability Heuristic2.3%This article: 1.0%Josh Boak: 0.5%NBC4 Washington: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic1.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.2%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Josh Boak: 2.7%NBC4 Washington: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias1.6%This article: 5.5%Josh Boak: 5.1%NBC4 Washington: 8.8%Framing Effect5.5%This article: 2.1%Josh Boak: 0.3%NBC4 Washington: 0.4%Loss Aversion2.1%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.7%NBC4 Washington: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%NBC4 Washington: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.4%Josh Boak: 2.5%NBC4 Washington: 1.5%Optimism Bias6.4%This article: 14.5%Josh Boak: 2.7%NBC4 Washington: 1.8%Pessimism Bias14.5%This article: 15.4%Josh Boak: 10.3%NBC4 Washington: 7.2%Negativity Bias15.4%This article: 2.7%Josh Boak: 1.4%NBC4 Washington: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.8%NBC4 Washington: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Josh Boak: 0.9%NBC4 Washington: 0.2%In-Group Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.4%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Josh Boak: 0.9%NBC4 Washington: 0.8%Halo Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Josh Boak: 1.0%NBC4 Washington: 1.7%Recency Bias3.1%This article: 1.6%Josh Boak: 0.1%NBC4 Washington: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.4%NBC4 Washington: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 3.3%Josh Boak: 0.1%NBC4 Washington: 0.4%Straw Man3.3%This article: 19.8%Josh Boak: 3.0%NBC4 Washington: 4.0%Appeal to Authority19.8%This article: 1.6%Josh Boak: 0.7%NBC4 Washington: 0.5%False Dilemma1.6%This article: 6.9%Josh Boak: 1.2%NBC4 Washington: 1.6%Slippery Slope6.9%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%NBC4 Washington: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.6%Josh Boak: 2.0%NBC4 Washington: 1.8%Hasty Generalization3.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.2%NBC4 Washington: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.6%NBC4 Washington: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.9%Josh Boak: 3.0%NBC4 Washington: 2.6%Appeal to Emotion2.9%This article: 0.5%Josh Boak: 0.5%NBC4 Washington: 0.4%Begging the Question0.5%This article: 1.6%Josh Boak: 3.2%NBC4 Washington: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.7%NBC4 Washington: 0.7%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.2%Josh Boak: 0.3%NBC4 Washington: 0.7%Burden of Proof5.2%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.8%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.6%Josh Boak: 1.0%NBC4 Washington: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%NBC4 Washington: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.0%Josh Boak: 1.0%NBC4 Washington: 1.1%Unattributed Quote1.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.5%NBC4 Washington: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.8%Josh Boak: 3.5%NBC4 Washington: 2.3%Biased Writer Voice4.8%This article: 5.2%Josh Boak: 0.5%NBC4 Washington: 0.8%Indoctrination5.2%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.6%NBC4 Washington: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.2%NBC4 Washington: 0.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.3%NBC4 Washington: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1048 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers19%attributed speech846writer words
Selected voice

Matthew Freedman

100%flagged-word coverage
65 attributed words32% of attributed speech61% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.9 ptsWriter: 5.9%Matthew Freedman: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Matthew Freedman: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Matthew Freedman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.