Insanity Plea Got Her Off. It Won’t Get Her Law License Back, Florida Supreme Court Rules 27%

By Theo Karantsalis34%

7/29/2026, 9:48:57 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 840 faulty-reasoning hits from 617 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.3% and a BS Rank of 27% (22,345 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the article peer group.

The Florida Supreme Court has rejected former Fort Lauderdale attorney Beatrice Bijoux’s bid to regain her law license, four years after she was found not guilty by reason of insanity for driving her SUV into a group of diners outside a Stuart Fresh Market. 
According to Florida Supreme Court records Miami New Times obtained through public records requests, the court on June 11 adopted a referee’s recommendation and dismissed Bijoux’s petition for reinstatement. 
The court also ordered her to pay $2,034.48 in costs to The Florida Bar. 
According to Referee Tesha Ballou’s report, Bijoux was admitted to The Florida Bar on Sept. 20, 2016, and had no prior disciplinary history prior to the 2022 incident. 
A 2016 graduate of Nova Southeastern University’s Shepard Broad College of Law, she later opened a personal injury practice in Fort Lauderdale. 
Bijoux petitioned for reinstatement after the Florida Supreme Court placed her on the inactive list for incapacity not related to misconduct in 2023, the referee’s report said. 
After considering the petition and The Florida Bar’s motion to dismiss, a referee concluded Bijoux failed to satisfy the requirements for reinstatement and recommended that her petition be dismissed. 
The case stems from a violent incident on Feb. 
22, 2022. 
According to a Stuart Police Department case report obtained by Miami New Times, surveillance video showed Bijoux driving her Kia SUV approximately 30 to 35 mph into people dining outside a Stuart Fresh Market, injuring four people before reversing at a high rate of speed and allegedly accelerating toward a witness who attempted to stop her from fleeing. 
Stuart Police Sgt. 
John Reddick reported that after Bijoux was taken into custody, she spontaneously stated, “The voices in my head told me to kill someone. 
” 
Prosecutors ultimately charged Bijoux with four counts of attempted first-degree murder, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and fleeing law enforcement. 
She was later found not guilty by reason of insanity and committed to a state mental health facility for treatment. 
After her release from treatment, Bijoux petitioned to return to the practice of law. 
But the referee concluded that Bijoux “has not demonstrated the fitness necessary to resume the practice of law and has not satisfied the criteria for reinstatement to the practice of law. 
” 
Ballou also found that Bijoux’s petition reflected “ongoing emotional or mental instability and financial irresponsibility,” both of which constitute grounds for denying reinstatement under the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. 
The referee noted that Bijoux remained under court supervision, was required to live at Dayspring Village, an assisted living facility for adults with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders, and had not provided documentation demonstrating she was fit to resume practicing law. 
The referee also cited Bijoux’s outstanding federal tax debt, which had grown to more than $36,500 with penalties and interest, as evidence of financial irresponsibility under Florida Bar rules. 
The Florida Supreme Court adopted Ballou’s recommendation, dismissed Bijoux’s petition for reinstatement, and ordered her to pay $2,034.48 in costs. 
She is not eligible to practice law in Florida. 
Bijoux did not return an email from Miami New Times seeking comment. 
Editor’s Note: Mental health conditions are treatable, and help is available. 
If you or someone you know is experiencing a mental health crisis or having thoughts of suicide, call or text the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by dialing 988. 
Trained counselors are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. 
If you believe someone is in immediate danger of harming themselves or others, call 911 or go to the nearest emergency room. 
For information about mental health services and support, visit: https://988lifeline.org https://www.nami.org 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 1.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.1%Theo Karantsalis: 3.5%Miami New Times: 3.0%Availability Heuristic14.1%This article: 9.2%Theo Karantsalis: 2.3%Miami New Times: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic9.2%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Theo Karantsalis: 1.7%Miami New Times: 5.0%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 1.8%Theo Karantsalis: 0.4%Miami New Times: 0.1%Loss Aversion1.8%This article: 4.4%Theo Karantsalis: 1.1%Miami New Times: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Theo Karantsalis: 0.6%Miami New Times: 1.4%Optimism Bias2.3%This article: 5.0%Theo Karantsalis: 1.3%Miami New Times: 0.8%Pessimism Bias5.0%This article: 14.9%Theo Karantsalis: 7.7%Miami New Times: 7.9%Negativity Bias14.9%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Theo Karantsalis: 1.6%Miami New Times: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error6.5%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 2.4%Miami New Times: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.6%Theo Karantsalis: 4.9%Miami New Times: 2.3%Appeal to Authority19.6%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.6%Theo Karantsalis: 1.7%Miami New Times: 2.9%Hasty Generalization6.6%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.8%Theo Karantsalis: 3.6%Miami New Times: 3.7%Appeal to Emotion13.8%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 3.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.5%Theo Karantsalis: 0.4%Miami New Times: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.5%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.7%Theo Karantsalis: 0.9%Miami New Times: 2.3%Unattributed Quote3.7%This article: 1.9%Theo Karantsalis: 1.4%Miami New Times: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.9%This article: 10.2%Theo Karantsalis: 2.8%Miami New Times: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice10.2%This article: 10.0%Theo Karantsalis: 5.0%Miami New Times: 2.6%Indoctrination10.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Theo Karantsalis: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Theo Karantsalis: 1.6%Miami New Times: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.5%

617 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers12%attributed speech544writer words
Selected voice

John Reddick

100%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words33% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+95.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%John Reddick: 95.8%95.8%Biased Writer Voice-11.6 ptsWriter: 11.6%John Reddick: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-11.4 ptsWriter: 11.4%John Reddick: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.4 ptsWriter: 7.4%John Reddick: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+2.1 ptsWriter: 2.0%John Reddick: 4.2%4.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.