nola.com29%

Are Mississippi River restoration efforts working? Scientists say this fish could hold the answer. 19%

By Alex Lubben37%

8/3/2026, 7:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 817 faulty-reasoning hits from 647 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28% and a BS Rank of 19% (22,166 of 27,227 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the article peer group.

LOCH LEVEN, Miss.  A cast net spread out like a spiderweb over murky waters, hung for a moment and dropped. 
Charles Vaughan hauled it in and found what he’d traveled 1,000 miles for: a baby fish. 
The alligator gar was already more than a foot long at about two months old, armored in hard scales with a pointed snout full of sharp teeth. 
The species can live for a century and grow to more than seven feet long. 
“They’ve got super fast growth rates,” said Solomon David, a professor of aquatic ecology at the University of New Orleans who calls himself “the gar guy.” 
Under the right conditions, these fish can grow to over two feet long within a year. 
“The right conditions are basically like here,” David said. 
But the ring levee would be overtopped when the river rose too high, inundating the entire property all at once, filling it like a bathtub. 
Those floods happened sporadically throughout the 20th century, once every few decades. 
Then, they started happening back-to-back  in 2008, 2011, 2013 and 2019. 
“Several hundred-year floods in a row,” said Will Prevost, a director of freshwater programs with the Nature Conservancy. 
“They’d have to cut the levees  or they blew out  every time.” 
And every time the levees were overtopped, the farmland would be ruined. 
Animals on the property  deer, raccoons  would drown. 
So the landowners reached out to the Nature Conservancy. 
They designed a simple structure, a box culvert with a valve that can be opened and closed. 
“It allows the water on the interior of the property to rise and fall with the flood pulse of the Mississippi River,” Prevost said, keeping the river from busting through the levees. 
“It also acts more like a natural floodplain, like it’s supposed to.” 
“Projects like this are becoming increasingly necessary, I think, on a global scale,” said Joshuah Perkin, a professor of ecology and conservation biology at Texas A&M who was not involved with the project. 
“When levees are put in place, the connection from the river to the floodplain is severed. 
This is a pattern that's happening everywhere.” 
Now, David is here looking for gars, to find out whether the floodplain is providing habitat for spawning fish. 
Alligator gars need flooded vegetation to spawn  exactly the type of landscape that Loch Leven provides. 
“If we find baby gars on the floodplain, it’s a good indication that the floodplain is serving its use as far as supporting aquatic wildlife,” David said. 
They’ll age their gar specimens using their otoliths, a type of ear bone made of calcium carbonate crystal. 
Humans have them too; when ours slip out of alignment, we get vertigo. 
A specialized saw cuts that crystalline bone into thin slices, and the cross sections show rings, like a tree’s, that can be counted under a microscope to estimate the fish’s age. 
“Although people at one point considered gars to be ‘trash fish,’ including alligator gars, they can serve as good indicators of aquatic ecosystem health,” David said. 
“And it’s not just gars that we see here. 
We see crappie, we see bass, we see sunfish  all kinds of other fish. 
We’re just using gars as a representative group.” 
And though they’re looking specifically for alligator gar, David said that’s because they function as an “indicator species.” 
If the gars are doing well, that’s a sign that the ecosystem is healthy. 
And because they migrate between the river and the floodplain, they can give scientists a fuller picture of the health of the broader riverine ecosystem. 
“It would be great to see projects connecting the floodplain to the river throughout the Mississippi River, and even on other rivers,” he said. 
“We can show folks up north the value of floodplains.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.1%Alex Lubben: 1.6%nola.com: 2.0%Confirmation Bias13.1%This article: 2.6%Alex Lubben: 0.5%nola.com: 0.9%Anchoring Bias2.6%This article: 9.7%Alex Lubben: 1.3%nola.com: 2.0%Availability Heuristic9.7%This article: 11.9%Alex Lubben: 2.1%nola.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic11.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.4%nola.com: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Alex Lubben: 0.8%nola.com: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias6.5%This article: 0.9%Alex Lubben: 2.5%nola.com: 3.2%Framing Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.3%nola.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.0%Alex Lubben: 0.3%nola.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.8%Alex Lubben: 1.3%nola.com: 3.7%Optimism Bias13.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 3.7%nola.com: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Alex Lubben: 3.8%nola.com: 3.2%Negativity Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Alex Lubben: 1.4%nola.com: 2.4%Halo Effect10.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Alex Lubben: 1.1%nola.com: 0.9%Recency Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.1%nola.com: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.2%nola.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 5.7%nola.com: 2.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.2%nola.com: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 3.9%Alex Lubben: 1.7%nola.com: 0.4%Slippery Slope3.9%This article: 6.3%Alex Lubben: 0.6%nola.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning6.3%This article: 11.3%Alex Lubben: 2.9%nola.com: 2.2%Hasty Generalization11.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.1%Alex Lubben: 0.4%nola.com: 0.4%Bandwagon5.1%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 2.2%nola.com: 2.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 3.9%Alex Lubben: 0.5%nola.com: 0.4%Begging the Question3.9%This article: 4.3%Alex Lubben: 1.5%nola.com: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 1.9%Alex Lubben: 1.0%nola.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature1.9%This article: 2.2%Alex Lubben: 1.0%nola.com: 0.3%Composition/Division2.2%This article: 2.5%Alex Lubben: 2.2%nola.com: 1.8%Anecdotal2.5%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.0%Alex Lubben: 0.8%nola.com: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.9%Alex Lubben: 0.4%nola.com: 0.1%Special Pleading4.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 2.1%nola.com: 1.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.9%nola.com: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.4%nola.com: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.8%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.4%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Lubben: 0.6%nola.com: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

647 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers55%attributed speech288writer words
Selected voice

Joshuah Perkin

100%flagged-word coverage
56 attributed words16% of attributed speech49% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.