Grasshopper Fire Sends Smoke to Portland and Threatens Timberline Lodge 13%

By Garrett Andrews28%

8/5/2026, 10:30:39 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 598 faulty-reasoning hits from 423 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (26,638 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the article peer group.

Most of Portland was wheezing under a thick layer of unhealthy smoke Wednesday as wildfire season revved into high gear across the Pacific Northwest. 
So far this year, more than 2 million acres have burned in the region from 1,200 separate wildfires. 
And dozens were burning Monday, when a westward shift in wind carried smoke from Central and Eastern Oregon into the metro area—disrupting concerts, summer camps and club sports. 
By Wednesday, Portland had some of the worst air quality among major cities in the world, according to IQAir and The New York Times, which ranked the Rose City No. 3 on its list of afflicted major American cities. 
Portland’s air is now considered unhealthy for sensitive groups, according to the state Department of Environmental Quality, though many parts of the state were experiencing worse. 
Much of the smoke now above Portland is from the Grasshopper Fire burning to the south of Mount Hood, according to Noah Alviz, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service. 
First reported July 23 west of Rocky Butte, the fire quickly spread aided by dry, hot conditions. 
It has burned more than 39,000 acres. 
It’s now 19% contained with more than 1,300 responders working the blaze. 
The historic Timberline Lodge on the south slope of Mount Hood has been placed under a Level 1 (get ready) evacuation order. 
Oregon emergency departments have seen elevated numbers of visits related to wildfire smoke and heat exposure, according to officials with the Oregon Health Authority who briefed reporters Wednesday afternoon. 
Gabriela Goldfarb, OHA environmental public health section manager, added that many of those affected are between 18 and 44, who tend to be healthier than other age groups. 
“We speculate that people in high-risk groups, like older people, those with underlying health conditions, are taking steps to protect their health,” Goldfarb says. 
“But folks in that younger cohort might feel a little bit less vulnerable.” 
The DEQ’s air quality alert will remain in effect until 11 am Thursday, though Alviz says the area won’t fully clear of smoke until Thursday night. 
“The fires are obviously what’s contributing to all this wildfire smoke, but ultimately it’s the winds that determine where the smoke is going to go,” Alviz tells WW. 
“And we’ve been having these persistent winds from the east bringing smoke out here to the west side of the state. 
Hopefully by (Thursday) we’ll have more of those west winds to help clear out the smoke from the Portland metro area.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.7%Garrett Andrews: 1.0%Willamette Week: 2.1%Confirmation Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.7%Willamette Week: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.8%Garrett Andrews: 1.3%Willamette Week: 2.1%Availability Heuristic12.8%This article: 6.6%Garrett Andrews: 0.3%Willamette Week: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic6.6%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.1%Willamette Week: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Garrett Andrews: 1.0%Willamette Week: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias6.6%This article: 9.0%Garrett Andrews: 2.7%Willamette Week: 3.8%Framing Effect9.0%This article: 5.2%Garrett Andrews: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.7%Loss Aversion5.2%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.3%Willamette Week: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.5%Willamette Week: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.9%Garrett Andrews: 1.0%Willamette Week: 1.6%Optimism Bias10.9%This article: 6.1%Garrett Andrews: 1.6%Willamette Week: 1.2%Pessimism Bias6.1%This article: 28.6%Garrett Andrews: 5.8%Willamette Week: 5.4%Negativity Bias28.6%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 2.0%Willamette Week: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Garrett Andrews: 1.0%Willamette Week: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error5.7%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.5%Willamette Week: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.3%Willamette Week: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.1%Willamette Week: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.4%Willamette Week: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 23.2%Garrett Andrews: 2.7%Willamette Week: 2.5%Appeal to Authority23.2%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.7%Willamette Week: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.4%Willamette Week: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.7%Garrett Andrews: 2.8%Willamette Week: 3.5%Hasty Generalization5.7%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.4%Willamette Week: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 2.9%Willamette Week: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.1%Willamette Week: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.6%Garrett Andrews: 1.4%Willamette Week: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.6%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.1%Willamette Week: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.1%Willamette Week: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 1.5%Willamette Week: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Garrett Andrews: 0.5%Willamette Week: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.2%Willamette Week: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.7%Garrett Andrews: 0.7%Willamette Week: 1.4%Unattributed Quote5.7%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.0%Willamette Week: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.8%Willamette Week: 3.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.4%Willamette Week: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 1.7%Willamette Week: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.5%Willamette Week: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Garrett Andrews: 0.5%Willamette Week: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

423 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers46%attributed speech229writer words
Selected voice

Gabriela Goldfarb

100%flagged-word coverage
65 attributed words34% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Unattributed Quote+36.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Gabriela Goldfarb: 36.9%36.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.