Pac-12, Mountain West conferences finalize settlement over `poaching' and exit fees 2%

By John Marshall0%

8/4/2026, 5:32:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Loss Aversion, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 260 faulty-reasoning hits from 352 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (30,224 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the article peer group.

The Pac-12 and Mountain West conferences have finalized a settlement over “poaching” and exit fees. 
The two conferences announced on Tuesday that all sides have reached final agreements to settle all pending litigation. 
The statement included Boise State, Colorado State, Utah State and The Board of Trustees of the California State University on behalf of San Diego State and Fresno State. 
“With these matters concluded, the conferences and institutions can move forward with certainty and focus on serving their student-athletes, campuses, fans, and communities,” the statement said. 
The conferences announced an agreement in principle in May. 
The Pac-12 and some of new the schools joining the conference filed a lawsuit in California in 2024, claiming the poaching clause the league agreed to when it signed a scheduling agreement for its football teams was invalid. 
The clause called for payments to the Mountain West of $10 million for the first team that left, with the amount increasing by $500,000 for every additional team  to a total of $55 million. 
The Pac-12 had its motion to dismiss denied by Judge Claudia Wilken in November after the sides failed to reach an agreement in mediation last summer. 
Colorado State and Utah State filed a separate lawsuit  later joined by Boise State  against the Mountain West seeking to avoid exit fees ranging from $19 million to $38 million. 
Colorado State, Utah State, San Diego State, Fresno State and Boise State are set to leave the Mountain West and join the Pac-12 this fall. 
The conference added Texas State last year to reach the eight-team minimum to be eligible for an automatic bid for its champion in the College Football Playoff. 
Gonzaga also is leaving the West Coast Conference to join the Pac-12 as a non-football member this fall. 
The Mountain West has added UTEP, Hawaii and Northern Illinois for football starting this fall. 
___ 
Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. 
Sign up here and here (AP News mobile app). 
AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-football 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 2.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 7.9%Framing Effect7.4%This article: 9.1%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion9.1%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.4%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 2.3%Optimism Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 11.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.4%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 1.4%Recency Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 2.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.7%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 3.6%Appeal to Authority7.7%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 3.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 6.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 2.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.8%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.8%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 3.7%The Independent: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 7.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 6.3%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 1.2%Indoctrination6.3%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 1.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%John Marshall: 0.0%The Independent: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.0%

352 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker4.3%attributed speech337writer words
Selected voice

Mountain West

0%flagged-word coverage
15 attributed words100% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.3 ptsWriter: 8.3%Mountain West: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Mountain West: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.