WRAL.com29%

White House signals Trump is weighing new strikes on Iran, and other developments in the Middle East 61%

By AAMER MADHANI83% SAMY MAGDY65% ELENA BECATOROS — Associated Press87%

7/31/2026, 7:58:13 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,086 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.5% and a BS Rank of 61% (12,001 of 30,584 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the article peer group.

CAIRO (AP)  The White House on Friday signaled that President Donald Trump is weighing carrying out new strikes on Iran as the U.S. presses for Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and abide by terms set out in a truce agreement the two sides forged last month only to quickly collapse. 
There were no U.S. strikes on Iran overnight, but Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard said it had struck another two tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, and Kuwait said it intercepted drones. 
Other WRAL Top Stories 
Meanwhile, Hamas confirmed Friday that it will disarm in a potential breakthrough for ending the war in Gaza, but major obstacles remain. 
Here are the most important developments across the Middle East today: 
Trump considering new strikes on Iran 
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt expressed the U.S. administration’s frustration anew, charging that Tehran last month signed a memorandum of understanding with the U.S. on a truce but then quickly “broke it, shot at commercial ships, and killed American soldiers.” 
“President Trump is not going to stand by and allow this terrorist behavior to occur,” Leavitt said in a statement on Friday evening. 
“Iran will continue to pay until they come to the table in, what President Trump deems, a meaningful way.” 
Leavitt issued the fresh warning after Trump earlier on Friday told reporters that “we just want to win” in Iran and signaled that he expected U.S. military action to continue for some time. 
“We’ll be hitting them very hard,” Trump said in an exchange with reporters during a meeting with members of his Cabinet at the Camp David presidential retreat in Maryland. 
“You know, at some point they’re going to say, ‘We just can’t take it anymore.’” 
Other developments on the Iran conflict 
Iran fired drones at Kuwait, a Gulf country hosting U.S. forces, and said it had also fired at oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway for global oil and gas shipments, which has been largely closed by the fighting. 
Kuwait’s Defense Ministry said Friday its armed forces had shot down drones inside Kuwaiti airspace. 
It said the Iranian attacks had targeted several vital military facilities, causing material damage from falling shrapnel but no casualties. 
It did not specify how many drones were intercepted. 
Iranian state media said Iran had targeted an air base in Kuwait with drones in retaliation for U.S. strikes on Thursday. 
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard claimed to have hit two oil tankers attempting to pass through the Strait of Hormuz. 
Iranian state media said four other tankers had turned around. 
The report did not provide further details on the tankers’ ownership, or whether there were any casualties. 
Gaza: Deal reached for Hamas to disarm, Israel to withdraw 
Hamas said it will begin disarming as part of a deal announced by Trump that also requires Israel to end its strikes and withdraw from Gaza. 
Hamas also said that laying down its heavy weapons, which would come later in the process, was contingent on the creation of a Palestinian state, something Israel’s current government adamantly rejects. 
Reflecting the hurdles of the potential disarmament, a series of Israeli airstrikes shook Gaza again on Friday, killing at least one Palestinian and wounding at least four, including a child, according to officials in hospitals near the attacks. 
The Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 
United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres welcomed the agreement, calling it the only good news in recent days from a troubled region. 
The deal must be implemented “without any questions, skepticism, or determination to undermine it,” he told reporters. 
Israel has not officially commented on the Hamas deal, which is part of a U.S.-brokered ceasefire announced last October. 
That agreement called for Hamas to disarm and hand over power to an independent Palestinian administration. 
Israel was to withdraw and an International Stabilization Force was to be deployed. 
But progress stalled, with Israel saying everything hinged on Hamas disarming, and Hamas accusing Israel of violating the agreement by continuing to carry out regular strikes on Gaza. 
The war in Gaza began after the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killed around 1,200 people and saw 251 taken hostage. 
Israel’s retaliatory offensive in Gaza has killed more than 73,000 Palestinians, including those killed since the ceasefire, Gaza’s Health Ministry says. 
The Associated Press is tracking the progress of Trump's plan to end the Israel-Hamas war. 
Elsewhere in the region: 
1. 
Saudi Arabia has announced a plan for a defense alliance of 14 countries to strengthen maritime security, safeguard freedom of navigation and secure international trade routes and energy supply corridors in the Red Sea region. 
The Iran war has severely disrupted global shipping. 
Yemen's Houthi rebels have declared a blockade on Saudi Arabia over a separate but related conflict, putting at risk another major trade corridor. 
2. 
Saudi Arabia's Defense Ministry said Thursday that the coalition is “defensive in nature,” and that access “remains open to all willing countries.” 
Oman and the United Arab Emirates were the only two Gulf countries that did not back Saudi Arabia’s statement. 
Turkey, Egypt and Pakistan were among those that joined the proposed alliance. 
3. 
A Houthi official, speaking Friday on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to brief the media, said the Saudi initiative won't protect its vessels  that would happen only after the Saudis lift their blockade on Yemen. 
Large crowds of Yemenis, meanwhile, took to the streets in the capital, Sanaa, and other Houthi-controlled areas to show support for the Iran-backed rebels and their Red Sea attacks against Saudi Arabia. 
The rallies were organized by the Houthis. 
4. 
In southern Lebanon, Israeli forces set off explosions Friday to destroy an underground tunnel network under the Crusader-built Beaufort Castle that Israel says had been used by Hezbollah militants as a command center. 
The 12th-century castle, also known as Al-Shaqif, was seized by Israeli forces in May. 
It was recently added to UNESCO’s World Heritage List over Israel’s objections. 
5. 
Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun said the Israeli operation sent “negative messages” ahead of upcoming talks in Rome. 
Israeli and Lebanese negotiating teams are set to meet again there to continue hammering out a plan under which Israel would withdraw from southern Lebanon in exchange for Hezbollah’s disarmament. 
Madhani reported from Washington and Becatoros contributed from Athens, Greece. 
Associated Press writer Fatma Khaled contributed to this report from Cairo. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.1%Aamer Madhani: 2.2%WRAL: 1.8%Confirmation Bias16.1%This article: 0.6%Aamer Madhani: 0.7%WRAL: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.6%This article: 3.2%Aamer Madhani: 1.8%WRAL: 2.3%Availability Heuristic3.2%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.5%WRAL: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.4%WRAL: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Aamer Madhani: 3.5%WRAL: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias2.1%This article: 4.2%Aamer Madhani: 8.7%WRAL: 4.4%Framing Effect4.2%This article: 1.7%Aamer Madhani: 0.4%WRAL: 0.3%Loss Aversion1.7%This article: 5.6%Aamer Madhani: 0.4%WRAL: 0.5%Status Quo Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.0%WRAL: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.4%Aamer Madhani: 4.4%WRAL: 1.3%Optimism Bias6.4%This article: 7.0%Aamer Madhani: 2.5%WRAL: 1.3%Pessimism Bias7.0%This article: 19.7%Aamer Madhani: 8.9%WRAL: 6.2%Negativity Bias19.7%This article: 2.0%Aamer Madhani: 2.6%WRAL: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.5%WRAL: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.4%WRAL: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.0%This article: 3.5%Aamer Madhani: 1.0%WRAL: 0.9%In-Group Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.6%WRAL: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Aamer Madhani: 0.8%WRAL: 0.9%Halo Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.0%WRAL: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.0%WRAL: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.0%Aamer Madhani: 1.5%WRAL: 1.2%Recency Bias3.0%This article: 2.3%Aamer Madhani: 0.3%WRAL: 0.2%Primacy Effect2.3%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.0%WRAL: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.6%WRAL: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.1%WRAL: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 3.2%WRAL: 1.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.6%Aamer Madhani: 1.3%WRAL: 0.9%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.9%WRAL: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.1%WRAL: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.4%Aamer Madhani: 1.8%WRAL: 2.0%Hasty Generalization5.4%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.2%WRAL: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.1%Aamer Madhani: 0.3%WRAL: 0.2%Bandwagon1.1%This article: 5.9%Aamer Madhani: 2.9%WRAL: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion5.9%This article: 1.6%Aamer Madhani: 0.5%WRAL: 0.5%Begging the Question1.6%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 2.3%WRAL: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.2%WRAL: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.3%WRAL: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.1%WRAL: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.1%WRAL: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.4%WRAL: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.0%WRAL: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 1.3%WRAL: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.0%WRAL: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.1%WRAL: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.1%WRAL: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.2%WRAL: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.1%WRAL: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.6%Aamer Madhani: 3.2%WRAL: 1.1%Unattributed Quote13.6%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.9%WRAL: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.8%Aamer Madhani: 3.5%WRAL: 1.9%Biased Writer Voice3.8%This article: 1.6%Aamer Madhani: 0.1%WRAL: 0.5%Indoctrination1.6%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.6%WRAL: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.2%WRAL: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aamer Madhani: 0.1%WRAL: 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1086 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers28%attributed speech778writer words
Selected voice

Karoline Leavitt

100%flagged-word coverage
83 attributed words27% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice+49.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Karoline Leavitt: 49.4%49.4%Unattributed Quote+6.3 ptsWriter: 16.6%Karoline Leavitt: 22.9%22.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.