Local 1034%

State of New Mexico sues Justice Department and Todd Blanche, saying they blocked its Epstein probe 15%

By SAVANNAH PETERS42% Associated Press74%

8/5/2026, 10:14:18 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 1,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,044 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (25,848 of 30,190 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the article peer group.

CEDAR CREST, N.M. 
(AP)  New Mexico’s attorney general sued the U.S. 
Department of Justice on Wednesday, accusing it of blocking the state from investigating sex crimes at Jeffrey Epstein’s former ranch near Santa Fe. 
The lawsuit in federal court in Washington, D.C., said the department and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stonewalled New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez’s criminal investigation into Epstein and others, taking action that “harms victims and undermines the public interest.” 
The lawsuit sought judicial intervention to force the federal government to turn over materials to New Mexico's investigators. 
It was filed the same day that the New Mexico House of Representatives released a report saying “those directly responsible for protecting New Mexicans relied on others to do their job,” including federal prosecutors in New York. 
Epstein took his own life in a federal jail in New York City in August 2019 after he was denied bail on sex trafficking charges lodged against him when he was arrested a month earlier. 
Epstein's former girlfriend and close associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her 2021 conviction on sex trafficking charges in New York. 
Witness testimony at Maxwell's trial alleged she and Epstein had sexually abused women at his New Mexico ranch. 
Justice Department says it’s following court orders to protect victims 
According to New Mexico's lawsuit, state prosecutors “have faced sustained resistance” to the kind of information-sharing common between state and federal investigators. 
The Justice Department said in a statement it was not releasing some information the state requested because of federal court orders that ban disclosing victim-identifying information. 
"New Mexico has provided no lawful basis to justify such sweeping disclosures,” the agency said. 
It said protecting victim privacy remains a top priority and the Justice Department "remains available to assist New Mexico’s investigation consistent with the law and binding court orders.” 
The lawsuit claims the Justice Department and Blanche were hiding information about Epstein and his co-conspirators when the state is one of the few jurisdictions that may still be able to hold Epstein's associates accountable or “provide some sense of justice to survivors.” 
New Mexico's attorney general said his office made 10 requests for key information that were ignored or denied. 
“We have heard repeatedly they will cooperate and what our team has experienced is anything but cooperation,” Torrez told reporters in a video call. 
State calls on Blanche to fix things with ‘a stroke of the pen’ 
“Todd Blanche today with a stroke of a pen could grant us the access that he claimed,” Torrez said. 
“Instead they have decided to stonewall, to obstruct and to frankly conceal for whatever reason.” 
The interim report released by the New Mexico Survivors' Truth Commission in part blamed federal prosecutors in Manhattan for a dearth of information about Epstein's activities in New Mexico. 
The commission, established in February by state lawmakers, said federal officials focused on Epstein’s misdeeds in New York, Palm Beach, Florida, and the Virgin Islands, while leaving his offenses in New Mexico unexamined. 
But the commission also cited evidence gathered by federal prosecutors in New York to describe women who recounted suffering sexual abuse from Epstein at his Zorro Ranch. 
At Maxwell's trial, Annie Farmer, now a psychologist, testified she was 16 when she agreed to go to the ranch, where Maxwell touched her breast during a massage and Epstein unexpectedly crawled into bed and pressed himself against her. 
A spokesperson for federal prosecutors in New York sent along the Justice Department statement on Epstein in response to a request for comment. 
Coinciding with the release of the report, about 50 members of the media and the public gathered in a legislative hearing room at the New Mexico state capitol on Wednesday to hear about the commission’s preliminary findings. 
Epstein accuser tells commission about abuse 
Rachel Benavidez, the lone speaker in the “survivor testimony” portion of the meeting, alleged that Epstein sexually abused her at Zorro Ranch. 
Benavidez said Epstein’s connections with powerful people in the state allowed him to “roam free here in New Mexico unchecked” after he was convicted of sex crimes elsewhere. 
“We don’t need more paper files sitting as artifacts,” Benavidez said, urging the commission to question “co-conspirators” who helped Epstein evade accountability in the state. 
Benavidez has said in interviews that she was brought to the ranch to work as a massage therapist beginning in the late 1990s. 
She said Wednesday that Epstein exploited “the one thing that meant everything to me at that time, my hard earned career.” 
A group of Epstein victims and victims' family members accused Blanche in a statement of “continuing to protect abusers” by withholding the information sought by New Mexico. 
“The DOJ’s argument that it won’t hand over files in order to protect survivors’ identities is laughable when the DOJ has already revealed their names and personal information,” they said. 
Epstein purchased his expansive property in Stanley, New Mexico, a sparsely populated ranching community about 30 miles (48 kilometers) south of Santa Fe, in 1993 from former Democratic Gov. 
Bruce King and built a hilltop mansion with a private airstrip and helipad. 
Epstein's ranch has been renamed ‘San Rafael Ranch’ 
The property was sold by Epstein’s estate in 2023 to the family of Don Huffines, a Republican recently appointed Texas' state comptroller. 
In a February social media post, Huffines said the property has been renamed San Rafael Ranch after a saint associated with healing and that his family plans to operate a Christian retreat there. 
The Justice Department in December started releasing investigative records pertaining to Epstein and Maxwell in accordance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. 
Accusers and members of Congress who fought to pass the transparency act quickly complained about shoddy redactions and too many sealed materials. 
Records that were released, including photographs, interview transcripts, call logs, court records and other documents, were either already public or heavily blacked out, and many lacked necessary context. 
___ 
Associated Press writers Larry Neumeister in New York and Jeffrey Collins in Columbia, South Carolina, contributed to this report. 
Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. 
All rights reserved. 
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.4%Savannah Peters: 2.5%Associated Press: 1.8%Confirmation Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.3%Associated Press: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Savannah Peters: 2.1%Associated Press: 2.7%Availability Heuristic9.8%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.6%Associated Press: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Savannah Peters: 5.3%Associated Press: 4.5%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 4.1%Savannah Peters: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.7%Loss Aversion4.1%This article: 2.1%Savannah Peters: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.3%Status Quo Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.0%Savannah Peters: 1.3%Associated Press: 2.0%Optimism Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 1.9%Associated Press: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 34.4%Savannah Peters: 7.7%Associated Press: 7.5%Negativity Bias34.4%This article: 6.7%Savannah Peters: 2.0%Associated Press: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Savannah Peters: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.6%In-Group Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 2.7%Associated Press: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Savannah Peters: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Savannah Peters: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.6%Ad Hominem5.5%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 3.8%Associated Press: 2.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 1.8%Savannah Peters: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.7%False Dilemma1.8%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 3.1%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.5%Savannah Peters: 1.8%Associated Press: 2.1%Hasty Generalization8.5%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.3%Savannah Peters: 3.6%Associated Press: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion7.3%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.5%Savannah Peters: 4.7%Associated Press: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.5%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.1%Savannah Peters: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.4%Burden of Proof4.1%This article: 3.2%Savannah Peters: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.2%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.3%Savannah Peters: 4.1%Associated Press: 1.2%Anecdotal14.3%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.9%Savannah Peters: 1.6%Associated Press: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.9%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.2%Savannah Peters: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.0%Special Pleading1.2%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.4%Savannah Peters: 1.1%Associated Press: 1.2%Unattributed Quote8.4%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.1%Savannah Peters: 0.7%Associated Press: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice4.1%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 1.8%Associated Press: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Savannah Peters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1044 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers33%attributed speech695writer words
Selected voice

Rachel Benavidez

81%flagged-word coverage
119 attributed words34% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote+14.6 ptsWriter: 3.9%Rachel Benavidez: 18.5%18.5%Biased Writer Voice-6.2 ptsWriter: 6.2%Rachel Benavidez: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.