Heat wave brings record-breaking temps, heightened wildfire risk to parts of Western US 23%

By TAMMY WEBBER12% SARAH RAZA23% Associated Press74%

8/1/2026, 10:35:23 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 992 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.3% and a BS Rank of 23% (21,105 of 27,152 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the article peer group.

A heat wave gripped large swaths of the Western U.S. on Saturday as temperatures hovered near record highs, heightening wildfire risks in areas that already are dry or burning and prompting warnings for people to stay inside. 
A ridge of high pressure is holding heat close to the ground  what’s known as a heat dome  from Arizona to Montana, though the good news is that it will be relatively short-lived, National Weather Service meteorologists said. 
Dangerous heat and warnings were plaguing the region, and the National Weather Service on Saturday forecast a number of cities that were expected to hit record highs. 
By late afternoon, Las Vegas reached 115 degrees Fahrenheit (46 degrees Celsius), the hottest temperature of the year; that's just one degree off the daily record of 116F (47C). 
Phoenix was expected to reach 116F (47C), while El Centro, California, was expected to hit a record 118F (48C). 
Even parts of Montana were expected to broil, with a record 104F (40C) forecast for Great Falls. 
In Las Vegas, Saturday's high was 10 degrees above normal, with meteorologists warning of dangerous heat through Sunday, when the high is expected to be 114F (45C), said weather service meteorologist Morgan Stessman. 
Overnight lows in the upper 80s to low 90s will make the situation especially dangerous because it doesn't allow people’s bodies to recover. 
“There's just no relief overnight,” Stessman said. 
People were being urged to stay indoors and hydrated. 
At the Justa Center in Phoenix, which caters to seniors but opens to the public as a cooling center in the afternoon, the biggest challenge is keeping up with the need for water and electrolytes, said operations director Rudy Soliz. 
He said about 200 people come in daily. 
“Anybody can come in, get a meal, sign up, get checked in through the cooling center, sit down, relax, watch a little TV, you know, catch themselves before they move on to another cooling center or their destination,” he said. 
Several cities nearing record temps 
The August record for Las Vegas is 116F (47C), while the hottest on record was 120F (49C) in July 2024, which also was the hottest summer on record, Stessman said. 
In Montana, the entire east side of the state was under an extreme heat warning Saturday, though by Sunday, much of the state will be in the 70s, said weather service meteorologist Jeff Kitsmiller. 
Still, it’s not as bad as the heat wave in mid-July, when some areas broke all-time records, including Billings, which reached 111F (44C) on July 12, Kitsmiller said. 
“That was a rare heat wave,” he said. 
“This one fits for this time of year.” 
The Montana Rescue Mission, a homeless shelter in Billings, opened its doors earlier than usual on Saturday to provide relief from temperatures. 
Dozens of people were expected throughout the day, and the shelter planned to provide dinner, beds and breakfast, a receptionist said. 
Great Falls Parks and Recreation's four swimming pools and three splash pads were crowded with people trying to beat the heat, said Katy Houseman, who works at one of the city's recreation centers. 
“They’re definitely hitting the pools and doing the splash pads outside and then trying to hide inside where there’s air conditioning,” said Houseman. 
“It's super, super hot today.” 
Heat is exacerbating wildfire risks 
Forecasters were warning that this heat wave, combined with drying from past heat, will add to wildfire risks across the West. 
“We’re definitely worried about that” in Montana, where fires already are burning and high winds are forecast for the weekend, said Kitsmiller, adding that most of the state was under a red flag warning. 
In Nevada, “with this heat dome setting up, we’ve lost some of the moisture that we did have  like relative humidity in the afternoon bottoming out in the single digits in quite a few places,” Stessman said. 
The U.S. 
Forest Service has said there is an enhanced wildfire risk through Sunday in most of Southern California except for the coastline. 
Extreme heat and drought also have created dangerous wildfire conditions in the Pacific Northwest. 
Washington Gov. 
Bob Ferguson declared a state of emergency Saturday after unusually high temperatures and high winds exacerbated record wildfires across the state. 
He also banned most outdoor and agricultural burning through the end of September. 
Ferguson’s proclamation went into effect ahead of an unprecedented “particularly dangerous situation” Red Flag Alert by the National Weather Service, which rated the weather risk as “extreme” across Eastern Washington. 
More than 312 square miles (808 square kilometers) are currently burning in 12 large fires. 
A red flag alert also was given for eastern Oregon, where crews are battling several large wildfires, including the Rowe Creek Complex fire, which has grown to 490 square miles (1,269 square kilometers) with 57% containment. 
Climate change is making heat waves, wildfires more frequent 
Climate change from the burning of coal, oil and natural gas is causing larger, more intense and longer-lasting heat waves  which lead to more intense droughts and contribute to larger, more destructive wildfires. 
This year’s weather is also expected to be affected by El Nino, a natural warming of the equatorial Pacific that alters weather patterns and spikes temperatures across the globe. 
The current El Nino is expected to rank as among the most intense since the weather service began tracking the phenomenon in 1950, experts said. 
It's already broken records for intensity at its early stages, United Nations officials warned Friday. 
___Associated Press writer Martha Bellisle in Seattle contributed to this report. 
___The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. 
AP is solely responsible for all content. 
Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org. 
Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. 
All rights reserved. 
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.8%Tammy Webber: 1.3%Associated Press: 2.0%Confirmation Bias4.8%This article: 7.9%Tammy Webber: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.3%Anchoring Bias7.9%This article: 11.5%Tammy Webber: 1.1%Associated Press: 3.1%Availability Heuristic11.5%This article: 0.8%Tammy Webber: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.8%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Tammy Webber: 3.2%Associated Press: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias6.3%This article: 6.5%Tammy Webber: 1.5%Associated Press: 5.3%Framing Effect6.5%This article: 1.3%Tammy Webber: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.9%Loss Aversion1.3%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.5%Tammy Webber: 1.3%Associated Press: 2.5%Optimism Bias7.5%This article: 6.9%Tammy Webber: 0.4%Associated Press: 1.5%Pessimism Bias6.9%This article: 26.6%Tammy Webber: 4.7%Associated Press: 8.5%Negativity Bias26.6%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.5%Associated Press: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Tammy Webber: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error4.0%This article: 2.3%Tammy Webber: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Tammy Webber: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.9%Halo Effect7.4%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.3%Tammy Webber: 0.6%Associated Press: 1.1%Recency Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.1%Tammy Webber: 2.8%Associated Press: 3.0%Appeal to Authority15.1%This article: 2.1%Tammy Webber: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.8%False Dilemma2.1%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.7%Associated Press: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 1.8%Associated Press: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 16.0%Tammy Webber: 1.1%Associated Press: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.4%Tammy Webber: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.4%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.8%Tammy Webber: 0.8%Associated Press: 1.2%Anecdotal3.8%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.2%Associated Press: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.3%Associated Press: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.4%Associated Press: 4.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 5.6%Tammy Webber: 0.9%Associated Press: 0.4%Indoctrination5.6%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tammy Webber: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Tammy Webber: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.7%

992 words analyzed.

Speakers

10speakers51%attributed speech491writer words
Selected voice

Bob Ferguson

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words6.8% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Indoctrination+29.5 ptsWriter: 8.8%Bob Ferguson: 38.2%38.2%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.5 ptsWriter: 3.5%Bob Ferguson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.